The perspectives undergirding student development theory have evolved over time, yet few scholars have examined how various paradigms influence a specific developmental theory. In this literature review, I explored how constructivism, social constructionism, critical paradigms, and critical constructivism have shaped the study of self-authorship. Then, I investigated if and how race, racism, power, privilege, and oppression were accounted for in the self-authorship literature. The findings of my systematic literature review revealed the need to re-envision the journey toward self-authorship in a manner that is conscious of identity and power. Implications for moving toward a critical constructivist refinement of self-authorship are included.