In 2018 the Trump Administration's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) under Betsy DeVos moved to institute new recommendations for implementing Title IX in American educational institutions. In this dissertation I converse with the OCR regarding their new guidelines for interpreting Title IX in colleges and universities with respect to sexual misconduct proceedings. More specifically, I analyze several of their proposed changes using a distributive justice framework. First, I look at how alterations to the standards of evidence requirements affect risk, and the physical and psychological security of students on campus. Second, I argue that many of the OCR's changes will create burdensome financial and time costs without resulting in more just conditions. Third, I analyze the OCR's new definitions of "sexual harassment" and "hostile environment" from a standpoint of liberty, and ultimately conclude that these changes threaten the autonomy and moral development of students. Fourth, I define the democratic value of welfare relationally, and show how adversarial, legalistic student hearings threaten caring and cohesive social relationships on campus. Finally, I begin to envision a new kind of campus community, where barriers between different offices serving students and between different student groups are dissolved. This can help create a whole-school ethos of ethical sex in colleges, which will serve to lessen the incidence of sexual violence amongst college students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]