ERIC Number: ED632124
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2016
Pages: 160
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-3684-9256-8
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Differences between Dual Enrollment and Traditional Students: A Comparative Analysis
Stockton, James Clinton
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Auburn University
This study focused on the self-directed learning strategies of dual enrollment students. The use of self-directed learning strategies has been increasing throughout industry. The focus of the study was to examine the difference between the dual enrollment and a traditional student's self-directed learning strategies. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire was used with 92 community college students. There were no significant findings. However based on results, dual enrollment might be a way to increase a male dominated trade like A&P mechanics. Further research in this area suggested. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
Descriptors: Dual Enrollment, Independent Study, Learning Strategies, Questionnaires, Community College Students, Aviation Mechanics
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; Two Year Colleges
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A