NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED616685
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2021
Pages: 8
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Can Closed-Ended Practice Tests Promote Understanding from Text?
Hildenbrand, Lena; Wiley, Jennifer
Grantee Submission, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (43rd, 2021)
Many studies have demonstrated that testing students on to-be-learned materials can be an effective learning activity. However, past studies have also shown that some practice test formats are more effective than others. Open-ended recall or short answer practice tests may be effective because the questions prompt deeper processing as students must generate an answer. With closed-ended testing formats such as multiple-choice or true-false tests, there are concerns that they may prompt only superficial processing, and that any benefits will not extend to non-practiced information or over time. They also may not be effective for improving comprehension from text as measured by how-and-why questions. The present study explored the utility of practice tests with closed-ended questions to improve learning from text. Results showed closed-ended practice testing can lead to benefits even when the learning outcome was comprehension of text. [This paper was published in: "Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society," 2021, pp.327-333.]
Publication Type: Reports - Research; Speeches/Meeting Papers
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests; ACT Assessment
IES Funded: Yes
Grant or Contract Numbers: R305A160008