NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: ED596649
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2016-Apr-12
Pages: 33
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-
EISSN: N/A
A Meta-Analysis of Comparability Studies on Computer-Based Testing and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K-12 Mathematics Tests
Pan, Qianqian
AERA Online Paper Repository, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Washington, DC, Apr 8-12, 2016)
Comparability studies between CBT and PPT studied if there were score differences between these two versions. However, there were no consistent results across studies and time. The purpose of this study is to summarize the testing mode effects for K-12 mathematics tests by conducting a meta-analysis. 103 effect sizes of 32 studies were collected across 1987 to 2013. Results find: (1) The estimated mean effect size was -0.11 with the standard error of 0.015. (2) Three moderator variables, grade, item type and source of studies, statistically significantly influenced the mean effect size. (3) A meta-regression showed that the relationship between the mean effect size and time of studies was statistically significant. (4) Sensitivity analysis indicated students with disabilities might get more disadvantages on CBT.
AERA Online Paper Repository. Available from: American Educational Research Association. 1430 K Street NW Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-238-3200; Fax: 202-238-3250; e-mail: subscriptions@aera.net; Web site: http://www.aera.net
Publication Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers; Reports - Research; Information Analyses
Education Level: Elementary Education; Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: National Assessment of Educational Progress
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A