The Certification and Accreditation in Science Education (CASE) Network has done a commendable job in their development of Draft Standards for Science Teacher Preparation (CASE and Network 1998). This paper is a response to the repeated requests of the CASE Network for feedback about the Standards. It focuses on the presentation of the standards rather than the standards themselves. The discussion primarily addresses the nature of the structure and presentation of the CASE Standards and suggests that the flexibility of electronic publishing can be exploited to overcome problems associated with the ordered presentation of the standards used in the current draft. (Author/CCM)