ERIC Number: ED289944
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 1987-Sep
Pages: 132
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Noncash Benefits. Methodological Review of Experimental Valuation Methods Indicates Many Problems Remain. Report to Congressional Requesters.
General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Program Evaluation and Methodology Div.
Increasingly the poor have been receiving federal assistance through goods and services rather than cash. These goods and services have not been counted when measuring the income and poverty of the recipients. This report examines three proposals to change the manner in which poverty is measured. All include ways to calculate the value of noncash benefits. The examination of each proposal is based on the following five questions: (1) What is the basis for defining income?; (2) Are the methods valid?; (3) Do the values that are assigned actually represent the benefits that are received?; (4) What is the quality of the data and analytic procedures used to assess benefit values?; and (5) Are definitions used consistently across key steps of poverty measurement? It was found that changes in these factors could change the classification of a family's level of poverty. (VM)
Descriptors: Assessed Valuation, Definitions, Economic Status, Federal Aid, Income, Poverty, Welfare Recipients
U.S. General Accounting Office, Post Office Box 6015, Gaithersburg, MD 20877 (1-5 copies free; additional copies $2.00 each).
Publication Type: Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Program Evaluation and Methodology Div.
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A