Objective: To explore diverse stakeholders' perceptions of headgear use in collegiate women's lacrosse. Participants: 189 collegiate women's lacrosse stakeholders (players: n = 87; coaches: n = 71; officials: n = 32). Methods: Participants completed online open-ended qualitative questions surrounding headgear use in the sport. Responses were coded by the research team via inductive reasoning. Results: Stakeholders felt that incorporating headgear use into women's lacrosse would "increase aggression" and "change the nature of the sport." Some felt that headgear was important for "injury risk mitigation" and invoked a need for "research and development." Stakeholders raised the need for "coaching and officiating improvement" as primary injury prevention measures. Players were concerned about "esthetics and performance limitations." Finally, many felt that it should be left to "player choice" to wear headgear or not. Conclusion: Most stakeholders invoke concerns of risk compensation and changing the nature of the sport of women's lacrosse, and are in favor of headgear remaining optional.