NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 586 to 600 of 2,342 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trent, Judith – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Responds to Ernest Boyer's new definition of scholarship, outlining concepts with which the author agrees, and the author's concerns. Outlines ways in which the Boyer's ideas are potentially counterproductive for the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rubin, Alan M. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses concerns with Ernest Boyer's redefinitions of what scholarship is. Argues the need for fair and consistent application of assessment standards for scholarship but notes problems of consistency and quality of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shelton, Michael W. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses the Carnegie Foundation's 1997 report, "Scholarship Assessed." Offers an overview of the text itself, and discusses the centrality of discourse and argument to the work. Discusses implications for…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Svinicki, Marilla D.; Menges, Robert J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
Good programs for recognizing exemplary college teaching are consistent with institutional mission and values, are grounded in research-based competencies and practices, recognize all significant facets of instruction, reward both collaborative and individual achievements, neither preclude nor replace the institutional reward system, call on those…
Descriptors: Awards, College Instruction, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Franke, Ann H. – Academe, 2001
Asserts that for universities to avoid the growing possibility of lawsuits, tenure evaluation procedures must be clear and fair. Provides suggestions to reduce the likelihood of litigation and to increase the institution's chance of success in a lawsuit. (EV)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Evaluation Problems, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cannon, Robert – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Examines the evaluation of teaching in entire programs, departments, and institutions. Discusses the varying levels of evaluation and their corresponding methodologies, asserting that these indicate the broadening context in which the evaluation of teaching is now taking place. (EV)
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hiltner, Arthur A.; Loyland, Mary O. – Journal of Education for Business, 1998
Accounting faculty (n=180) rated items for effectiveness in assessing research, teaching, and service. They perceived a strong role for department chairs in all three areas. Their ratings of their institutions assessment programs were not high. (SK)
Descriptors: Accounting, College Faculty, Department Heads, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Seldin, Peter – Academe, 2000
Argues that the use of teaching portfolios can improve college faculty teaching skills and provide evaluators with useful information in promotion/tenure decisions. Suggestions are offered for portfolio content, portfolio design, and ways to create an institutional climate of acceptance. (DB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McLean, S. Vianne; Callarman, Thomas E. – Innovative Higher Education, 1999
Describes the development and implementation of the Arizona post-tenure review policy, with particular emphasis on the Arizona State University experience. This policy had to balance the different expectations of the Arizona Board of Regents, the faculty, and university administration. Outlines communication strategies used in negotiations with…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Faculty, Cooperation, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kurz, Lisa; Banta, Trudy W. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
This chapter outlines the understanding gained when working with faculty to learn about assessment, to develop a plan, and to support them as they carry out and interpret their assessments. (Contains 1 table and 1 exhibit.)
Descriptors: Exhibits, Faculty Development, Intellectual Disciplines, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Margaret L. – Academic Questions, 2003
For too strictly judging job applicants on their academic merits, an outstanding Brooklyn College history professor incurred administrative wrath that--in a vicious campaign of innuendo and slander couched in allegations of "uncollegiality"--almost sank his career. Margaret King chronicles how an alliance of those interested in scholarly…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Teacher Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Tenure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tu, Chih-Hsiung – Performance Improvement, 2004
The evaluation of training faculty performance is a major institutional consideration for improving training and determining the timing of promotion. The common techniques used in evaluating teaching are peer evaluations and student evaluations. These methods are plagued by inconsistent results because the aspects evaluated in online teaching and…
Descriptors: Trainers, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Student Evaluation, Online Courses
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides
Freeman, Elmer; Gust, Susan; Aloshen, Deborah – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
Communities across our nation--whether geographic, ethnic, or issue-based in their composition--are struggling to be healthy, to grow, and thrive. The production of knowledge and the sharing of knowledge by both the community and the higher education institution is the key to helping our communities improve. Retaining and valuing community-engaged…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Faculty Promotion, Tenure, Partnerships in Education
Cashin, William E. – 1996
This paper discusses the principles of an effective faculty evaluation system that are repeatedly recommended in the literature. These principles include the following: (1) clarify institutional goals; (2) decide on the purposes of the data to be collected; (3) use pilot programs when appropriate; (4) significantly involve participants in the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  ...  |  157