Publication Date
In 2025 | 4 |
Since 2024 | 20 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 55 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 96 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 240 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 247 |
Postsecondary Education | 166 |
Two Year Colleges | 10 |
Adult Education | 5 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 312 |
Administrators | 162 |
Teachers | 120 |
Policymakers | 40 |
Researchers | 29 |
Students | 7 |
Media Staff | 2 |
Counselors | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Australia | 33 |
Canada | 30 |
United Kingdom | 28 |
California | 19 |
China | 14 |
United States | 14 |
United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 12 |
United Kingdom (England) | 11 |
Pennsylvania | 9 |
New York | 8 |
Texas | 7 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Students Evaluation of… | 4 |
Flanders System of… | 1 |
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
National Survey of Student… | 1 |
Teacher Performance… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Melone, Rudolph Joseph – 1969
Community colleges should be responsive to the shifting needs of society. As in the case of other organizations, however, the ability to initiate and adapt to the necessary changes is dependent on the attitudes and backgrounds of the people in the institution. A primary concern of this study was determining whether junior colleges accept the…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Attitude Change, Faculty, Faculty Evaluation
Schafer, Michael I., Comp. – 1971
This document attempts to provide information on what has been done on evaluation of faculty in Florida's community junior colleges. There is a need for a clear definition of excellent teaching and a need for a means of measuring or evaluating such teaching. The five discussions comprising this document are: (1) evaluation of faculty by students,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Faculty Evaluation, Relevance (Education)
Illinois Community Coll. Board, Springfield. – 1974
The 1973-74 survey is a combination of past years Faculty Salary Survey and Administrative Salary Survey. In addition, the present survey has been greatly attentuated because of a reduced budget and the commitment to collect less data from the community colleges where applicable. The survey instrument was designed to collect the information about…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty
Geisert, Paul – 1973
A model for evaluating the professional activities of elementary school teachers is presented. It is based on: (1) a systematic process for reporting their activities; (2) discrepancy evaluation--the comparison of goals and objectives with outcomes; and (3) product rather than process evaluation. Teacher activity in nine categories is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Elementary School Teachers, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Geisert, Paul – 1973
A model for evaluating the professional activities of high school teachers is presented. It is based on: (1) a systematic process for reporting their activities; (2) discrepancy evaluation--the comparison of goals and objectives with outcomes; and (3) product rather than process evaluation. Teacher activity in nine categories is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Guides
Cook, J. Marvin; Neville, Richard F. – 1971
This paper examines the problem of measuring and evaluation teacher performance. Evaluation methods currently in use are reviewed, including the use of student questionnaires, and a recommendation for a more accurate measurement of teacher effectiveness is made. The authors specifically consider the relative merits of measurement based on student…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Graham, Margaret H. – 1972
A study was conducted to determine if the tendency for faculty members of higher rank to receive the highest ratings on the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) remained when variables such as class size and course level were taken into account. The relationship between CEQ ratings and instructor's rank, class size, and level of course…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Class Size, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation

Jacko, Carol M.; Karmos, Ann H. – Teacher Educator, 1978
Three teaching evaluation forms for assessing university supervisors are presented. The forms are designed for use by student teachers, cooperating teachers, and administrators, respectively, and each form uses different criteria. (DS)
Descriptors: Cooperating Teachers, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion

Sanchez, Bonnie M. – Community/Junior College Research Quarterly, 1977
Presents abstracts of selected ERIC documents on community college faculty evaluation. (DC)
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria

Johnson, Thomas B.; Rabin, Kenneth – Public Relations Review, 1977
Discusses a study designed to determine existing trends in the backgrounds and qualifications of public relations instructors and how these might affect public relations education. Available from: Public Relations Review, Ray Hiebert, Dean, College of Journalism, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. (MH)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Research, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Schwartz, Donald F. – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1988
Shares Cornell University's efforts to work with faculty on the problem of reports that anticipate departmental and faculty data needed during the year. (MS)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrator Role, Annual Reports, Department Heads
Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis – Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 1986
Faculty resistance to an annual faculty evaluation system implemented at the University of Northern Colorado was widespread. Four factors characterized faculty members most dissatisfied with the evaluation of their performance: years in service at the university, level of the evaluation, impact on salary, and inconsistency among the evaluators.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Participant Satisfaction
Aigner, Dennis J.; Thum, Frederick D. – Economic Education, 1986
Reports the results of a study which examined the relationship of both student and course characteristics to student rankings of instructors. The 1984 data (n=1,333) showed that 67% of the variation in students' evaluations was explained by instructor-specific variables. Presents detailed regression analysis tables and includes copies of the…
Descriptors: Economics Education, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Regression (Statistics)
Cudney, Shirley A. – Nursing Health Care, 1985
Describes a faculty evaluation model that integrates ingredients of personal development, such as self-satisfaction, growth, and improvement, with such rewards as merit pay, wage increases, promotions, and tenure. Discusses criteria; guidelines for their use; the standards for tenure, promotion, and appointment; and the annual review process. (CT)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines, Individual Development, Models

Hollenbeck, Albert R.; Small, Arnold C. – Teaching of Psychology, 1986
Provides a point-by-point response to the questions raised in Pasnak's review (S0 515 248). Attention is called to design and measurement issues for future research. (Author/JDH)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Psychology