NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 496 to 510 of 2,338 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dienemann, Jacqueline; Shaffer, Carol – Journal of Professional Nursing, 1992
Content analysis was done of actual performance appraisal policies, procedures, and forms of 86 schools with graduate programs in nursing. Performance appraisal systems were found to be in early stages of development. There was agreement of teaching, service, and research as domains; there was less consensus as to the attributes of domains. (JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Graduate Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Geis, George L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Conditions that can enhance college teachers' acceptance and productive use of feedback about instruction are outlined, including understanding of the purposes of evaluation, who provides the feedback, the message itself (form, timing, sources, and subsequent messages), characteristics of the recipient, immediate environment, and consequences…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Communication (Thought Transfer), Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Licata, Christine M.; Andrews, Hans A. – Community College Review, 1990
Describes a study of posttenure faculty review in community colleges in the north central United States, indicating that 70 percent of 610 respondents had systems for posttenure review. Discusses evaluation criteria; outcomes and problems associated with the review process; perceptions regarding effectiveness and benefit of posttenure evaluation;…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martsolf, Donna S.; Dieckman, Barbara Cline; Cartechine, Kathryn A.; Starr, Patricia J.; Wolf, Linda E.; Anaya, Ella R. – Journal of Nursing Education, 1999
Kent State University nursing faculty established a peer-review process through a task-force approach. Classroom and clinical observations and teaching circles were the most effective methods. Program success was attributed to its voluntary nature, its reflection of organizational culture, and administrative support. (SK)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rau, A. Ravi P.; Masse, Michelle A.; Wittkopf, Eugene R.; Kinney, Ralph A. – Academe, 2000
Presents recommendations of a faculty/administrator committee at Louisiana State University concerning faculty ranks and reviews, especially of nontenured full-time faculty who specialize in either teaching or research. It proposes rolling multiple-year contracts for instructors, new titles for non-teaching research scientists, university…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Contracts, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lander, Dorothy – Quality in Higher Education, 2000
The author reflects on the process of assembling an evaluation dossier after a year as an assistant professor that examined questions of quality related to the traditional evaluation categories of teaching, research and service by performing a critically reflexive self-assessment exercise that applied action-research methodology of appreciative…
Descriptors: Action Research, Beginning Teachers, College Faculty, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Read, William J.; Rama, Dasaratha V.; Raghunandan, K. – Journal of Education for Business, 2001
Administrators of accounting education programs (106 respondents) were asked about the use of student evaluations of faculty and the relative importance of teaching in evaluations. The relative emphasis given student evaluations was inversely associated with the weight assigned to teaching in faculty evaluations. (SK)
Descriptors: Accounting, Business Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fincher, Ruth-Marie E.; Simpson, Deborah E.; Mennin, Stewart P.; Rosenfeld, Gary C.; Rothman, Arthur; McGrew, Martha Cole; Hansen, Penelope A.; Mazmanian, Paul E.; Turnbull, Jeffrey M. – Academic Medicine, 2000
Maintains that creative teaching with effectiveness that is rigorously substantiated, demonstrated educational leadership, and use of educational methods that advance learners' knowledge are consistent with the traditional definition of scholarship and faculty who meet these criteria are scholars and should be recognized by promotion. Outlines an…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menges, Robert – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Menges identifies four areas of educational research in which data is substantial but much less useful than it could be: faculty behaviors and intentions; technology-mediated instruction; effective evaluative decisions and context-specific research. He suggests some directions for future research. (JM)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Data Interpretation, Educational Research, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ory, John C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000
Ory emphasizes four processes in assessing faculty: examining the craft of teaching; faculty members reflecting on the quality of and standards for their work; receiving feedback from others with the expectation that faculty will improve and assessing the work of others by focusing on the value of the work. (JM)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fairweather, James S. – Journal of Higher Education, 2002
A principal belief embedded in promotion and tenure and in annual review decisions is that faculty members should and can be simultaneously productive in teaching and research. This study used national survey data to estimate by discipline and type of institution the percentage of faculty who meet this standard. (Author)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leslie, David W. – Journal of Higher Education, 2002
Analysis of data from the 1993 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty showed that faculty value teaching over research. At the same time, the explicit reward structure of academe favors research and publication, rewarding "productivity" in these arenas with money and status. Implications of this disconnect between values and rewards…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Quilter, Shawn; Weber, Roberta K. – International Journal on E-Learning, 2004
Skeptics may be quick to question the quality of teaching and learning in the online environment. Thus, to answer questions about quality of instruction, it is essential to find ways to identify and illustrate best practice for teaching and learning that takes place in eLearning environments. Within the context of this article and the belief of…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Online Courses, Faculty Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldman, Phillip – Education, 2005
While there are many factors that affect the quality of teacher education programs, one specific related factor, a culture of accountability, will be addressed in this reflection of Haberman's work. A systematic review of faculty performance with specific rubrics and increasing expectation based on earned faculty rank is a necessary step in…
Descriptors: Teacher Education Programs, Faculty Evaluation, Accountability, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kater, Sue; Levin, John S. – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2004
This study examined shared governance in public, unionized community colleges and creates a national inventory of areas in which faculty participate in governance according to the language of collective-bargaining agreements. The findings suggest that community college faculty are engaged in shared governance in both the traditional academic areas…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Governance, Faculty Evaluation, Community Colleges
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  ...  |  156