NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 406 to 420 of 2,338 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blai, Boris, Jr. – Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 1972
Study considers the relative importance of research, teacher effectiveness, school and community service, as well as seniority in decisions pertaining to promotion and salary. ((Author/RK)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Faculty Evaluation, Incentives, Performance Criteria
Leonard, Wilbert M. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Reaction
Jandt, Fred E. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Reaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Deegan, William L. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Student Attitudes, Student Participation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schulman, Benson R.; Trudell, James W. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines
Cohen, Arthur M.; Brewer, Florence B. – Community Colleges, 1972
Faculty evaluation can play an important role in the professional growth of the individual instructor. Community Colleges is a monthly supplement to Change'' magazine. (MB)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Self Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation
Adams, Bernard S. – North Central Association Quarterly, 1972
Presidents expect deans to exercise primary, internal leadership to the end that the institution's most fundamental purposes can be realized. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Administrative Policy, Administrator Guides, Administrators
Huber, James H. – School and Society, 1972
College professors at Pennsylvania State University were asked how often they related their own research to the classes they taught; results indicated that research and teaching were not mutually reinforcing. (Author/SP)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Role, Faculty Evaluation, Research Utilization
Darnton, Donald C. – Educ Rec, 1970
Descriptors: Activism, Administrator Role, Administrators, Faculty Evaluation
Trueman, John H. – J Higher Educ, 1970
This article discusses the recommendation that the twelve Ontario teachers colleges become integrated with the province's universities. (Editor)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Improvement Programs, Schools of Education
Feldhusen, John F.; Starks, David D. – Coll Stud Surv, 1970
Study results indicate that significant, though low, correlations exist between student attitudes toward courses and their ratings of instructors. It seems reasonable to assume ratings of a course and teacher are chiefly a function of teacher incompetence as perceived by student. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Course Objectives, Faculty Evaluation, Rating Scales
Kenny, James A.; Herzing, Thomas W. – J Higher Educ, 1969
The games are Build a Reputation (REP), Confuse the Student (CON), Blame the Opposition (BOP), and Pass the Buck (BUCK). Professors play these games because they "want to show off on occasion, . . . want to get off the hook and avoid responsibility, . . . are prone to blame others, or simply because they are lazy. (WM)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Teacher Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Needham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Ways for improving college level faculty evaluation are examined. Three criteria are discussed: research performance, teaching performance, and administrative performance. Desirable features of faculty rewards systems are also described. (RM)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Witt, Peter A. – Parks and Recreation, 1982
Ranking the "top 10 universities" which train recreation professionals does little to enhance the goals and standards of the field of parks and recreation. While evaluation of faculty and educational institutions is considered important, it should be conducted in a manner which tends to be more professional than mere gossip. (JN)
Descriptors: Credibility, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Professional Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Souza, Anthony de; And Others – Journal of Geography, 1981
Describes a questionnaire survey which identified the contributions of geographers in four-year undergraduate geography departments. Lists of the top 20 departments for the following 11 variables are included: geography enrollment, impact within institution, geography majors, training for graduate school, articles, chapters, books, papers,…
Descriptors: Departments, Faculty Evaluation, Geography Instruction, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  ...  |  156