NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 166 to 180 of 568 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hopkins, Kenneth D.; Bibelheimer, Milo – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Group Testing, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Wass, Hannelore; And Others – Essence: Issues in the Study of Ageing, Dying, and Death, 1980
Various health and rehabilitative services staff participated in a four-day death education program. Participants in the program and a control group were given two equivalent forms of a knowledge test. The treatment group showed a higher gain score on the posttest than the control group. (RC)
Descriptors: Adults, Death, Educational Background, Group Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Thurlow, Martha; Tindal, Gerald; Powers, Richard; Lewis, Preston; Laitusis, Cara Cahalan; Breslin-Larson, Joan – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2007
Current educational policies require the participation of students with disabilities in state assessments. Their participation has raised a number of issues, among them the need for accommodations. In this article we consider the role that assistive technology (AT) can play to alleviate current accommodations demands, and highlight research and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Testing Accommodations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hamel, Ronald; Schmittmann, Verena D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
The Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test (APM) is a well-known measure of higher order general mental ability. The time to administer the test, 40 to 60 minutes, is sometimes regarded as a drawback. To meet efficiency needs, the APM can be administered as a 30-or 40-minute timed test, or one of two developed short versions could be used. In…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Cognitive Ability, Group Testing, Timed Tests
BEGGS, DONALD L.; HIERONYMUS, ALBERT N. – 1967
THE ASSUMPTION THAT ONE-TENTH OF THE YEARLY GROWTH IN ALL ACHIEVEMENT AREAS TAKES PLACE EACH MONTH OF THE SCHOOL YEAR AND THAT ONE-TENTH OF THE YEARLY GROWTH OCCURS DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS WAS INVESTIGATED. THE STUDY WAS CONDUCTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNUAL IOWA BASIC SKILLS TESTING PROGRAM IN THE STATE OF IOWA. MEDIANS FOR THE 11 SUBTESTS…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Grade Equivalent Scores, Group Testing, Scaling
JEFFS, GEORGE A.; AND OTHERS – 1967
AN INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE IF GROUPS OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS NUMERICALLY IN EXCESS OF 50 COULD BE AS EFFECTIVELY INSTRUCTED IN TYPEWRITING SKILLS AS GROUPS OF LESS THAN 30. STUDENTS ENROLLED IN 1ST-YEAR TYPEWRITING WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO TWO LARGE GROUPS AND THREE SMALL GROUPS TAUGHT BY THE SAME INSTRUCTOR. TEACHER-MADE,…
Descriptors: Group Instruction, Group Testing, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), High Schools
Crawford, Patricia – 1972
This report provides information to indicate that the North York Self Concept Inventory is - (1) sensitive - 23 of the 25 items do discriminate highly between pupils with high and pupils with low self concept scores; (2) reliable - a test-re-test reliability coefficient of .81 indicates pupils' responses are consistent over a brief (10 day) time…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Group Testing, Self Concept, Self Concept Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krieshok, Thomas S.; Harrington, Robert G. – Journal of Counseling & Development, 1985
Reviews the administrative features, uses, development, standardization, reliability, and validity of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB), a new group intelligence test designed to be a paper-and-pencil parallel to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). (BL)
Descriptors: Group Testing, Intelligence Tests, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Hull, Raymond H. – Colorado Journal of Educational Research, 1973
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Comparative Analysis, Group Testing, Individualized Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shipstone, K.; Burt, S. L. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973
575 adults drawn from both rural and urban areas completed a questionnaire designed and used originally by Flugel in 1947 to see how far lay opinions on intelligence reflect views held by professional psychologists and how far lay responses now differ from those reported by Flugel. (Editor)
Descriptors: Correlation, Educational Psychology, Group Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clarke, Lori – English Education, 1972
Descriptors: Educational Methods, Group Experience, Group Instruction, Group Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Young, Filson A.; Brown, Marvin – Psychological Reports, 1973
Descriptors: Anxiety, Elementary School Students, Group Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jacobs, Jon C. – Psychology in the Schools, 1971
Administration of the BG in a group situation provided as much, and as reliable, information as did individual administration. Besides the economy, it provided an opportunity to observe the individual child's functioning as a member of a peer group, both in relation to it and in conjunction with it. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cummings, Jack A.; Nelson, R. Brett – Journal of Educational Research, 1980
Because teachers' oral directions for group achievement tests assume that children understand numerous basic concepts, the construct validity of subtests assessing abilities other than language is questionable. Implications for teacher administration of primary level tests and suggestions for future test construction are described. (JD)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Group Testing, Language Skills, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Castor, Theresa – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
In the project described in this chapter, discussions during group exams were analyzed to gain insight into how students make group decisions for their answers and the implications of their decision-making methods for deepening student understanding.
Descriptors: Group Testing, Group Discussion, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Decision Making
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  ...  |  38