NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Goals 20001
Hatch Act1
Assessments and Surveys
Sequential Tests of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 279 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hickey, Andrew; Davis, Samantha; Farmer, Will; Dawidowicz, Julianna; Moloney, Clint; Lamont-Mills, Andrea; Carniel, Jess; Pillay, Yosheen; Akenson, David; Brömdal, Annette; Gehrmann, Richard; Mills, Dean; Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy; Machin, Tanya; Reich, Suzanne; Southey, Kim; Crowley-Cyr, Lynda; Watanabe, Taiji; Davenport, Josh; Hirani, Rohit; King, Helena; Perera, Roshini; Williams, Lucy; Timmins, Kurt; Thompson, Michael; Eacersall, Douglas; Maxwell, Jacinta – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2022
A growing body of literature critical of ethics review boards has drawn attention to the processes used to determine the ethical merit of research. Citing criticism on the bureaucratic nature of ethics review processes, this literature provides a useful provocation for (re)considering how the ethics review might be enacted. Much of this criticism…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Committees, Educational Research, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karlo Ložnjak; Anamaria Maleševic; Marin Cargo; Anamarija Mladinic; Zvonimir Koporc; Livia Puljak – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Personal data protection is an ethical issue. In this study we analyzed how research ethics committees (RECs) and data protection officers (DPOs) handle personal data protection issues in research protocols. We conducted a mixed-methods study. We included heads (or delegated representatives) of RECs and DPOs from universities and public research…
Descriptors: Research Committees, Ethics, Information Security, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarah Potthoff; Fee Roth; Matthé Scholten – Research Ethics, 2024
This study explores how qualitative health researchers navigate the demands of medical research ethics committees in Germany where qualitative research is subject to approval only when it is conducted in medical contexts. We present the results of a grounded theory study to investigate qualitative health researchers' experiences with procedural…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Health, Qualitative Research, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brown, Nicole – Research Ethics, 2023
The role of research ethics committees, and research ethics issues more broadly are often not viewed in the context of the development of scientific methods and the academic community. This topic piece seeks to redress this gap. I begin with a brief outline of the changes we experience within the social sciences before exploring in more detail…
Descriptors: Social Science Research, Research Methodology, Ethics, Research Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Costello, Eamon; Brunton, James; Bolger, Richard; Soverino, Tiziana; Juillerac, Clément – Online Learning, 2023
Ethical reviews of research plans function as a cornerstone of good research practice in order that no harm should come to participants. Ethical concerns have taken on a new salience in a digital world where data can be generated at scale. Big data research has grown rapidly, raising increased ethical concerns. Several intersecting areas of big…
Descriptors: MOOCs, Informed Consent, Educational Research, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aidan C. Tan; Angela C. Webster; Sol Libesman; Zijing Yang; Rani R. Chand; Weber Liu; Talia Palacios; Kylie E. Hunter; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Background: Data sharing improves the value, synthesis, and integrity of research, but rates are low. Data sharing might be improved if data sharing policies were prominent and actionable at every stage of research. We aimed to systematically describe the epidemiology of data sharing policies across the health research lifecycle. Methods: This was…
Descriptors: Information Dissemination, Data, Health, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hugo Boothby – Research Ethics, 2024
In 2019, a new national Ethics Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten, EPM) was created in Sweden. In 2020, Sweden's "Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans Act" was revised, tightening this legislation, and increasing penalties for its infraction. This article draws on empirical material generated by artistic research conducted…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Musicians, Disabilities, Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Limson, Elisa Bernadette E.; Pagkatipunan, Paulo Maria N.; Abrera, Anna Marie C. – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2023
The establishment of a research ethics committee (REC) is necessary in Philippine higher education institutions (HEI), but at present not all HEIs have an accredited REC. While past studies focused on how RECs are perceived by its different stakeholders, these perceptions have not been explored in the context of educational institutions without an…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Research Committees, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abrera, Anna Marie C.; Pagkatipunan, Paulo Maria N.; Limson, Elisa Bernadette E. – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2023
The establishment of a Research Ethics Committee (REC) is a significant step to ensure the standard procedures in ethics review process that protect human participants. However, in instances when RECs are not yet established, surrogate activities are practiced by some institutions. The objective of this study was to identify prevailing research…
Descriptors: Research Committees, Ethics, Educational Research, Educational Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rogers, Marg; Baker, Penelope; Harrington, Ingrid; Johnson, Amy; Bird, Jo; Bible, Vanessa – Issues in Educational Research, 2022
Stakeholder engagement is fundamental to the implementation of effective education research projects. Indeed, funders often partially judge research project applications on the evidence of quality stakeholder engagement. Thus, with high levels of competition for funding in education, and some community members judging successful projects by the…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Educational Finance, Educational Research, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sarven S. McLinton; Sarah N. Menz; Bernard Guerin; Elspeth McInnes – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) reviewers often provide similar feedback across applications, which suggests that the problem lies in researcher awareness of key issues rather than novel, unsolvable challenges. If common problems can be addressed before lodgement by applicants referencing clear evidence-based supports (e.g., FAQs on common…
Descriptors: Ethics, Informed Consent, Research Committees, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Angela Henderson; John Cassidy; Abigail Croydon; Melanie Nind – British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2024
Background: Inclusive research is widely accepted as an essential part of the process to democratise knowledge creation and dissemination. However, while peer review is an important part of academic publishing, the potential to include people with learning disabilities in this element of the research process has not previously been explored using…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Adults, Peer Evaluation, Inclusion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abukari Kwame; Pammla M. Petrucka – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Gaining ethical approval for qualitative health research and implementing all the planned research processes in a proposed study are not straightforward endeavours. The situation becomes more complex when qualitative research is conducted in a cross-national healthcare and academic context. Also, it is even exhausting when the study is…
Descriptors: Ethics, Doctoral Students, Student Research, Informed Consent
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nuttgens, Simon – Research Ethics, 2021
Ethical decision-making is inherent to the research ethics committee (REC) deliberation process. While ethical codes, regulations, and research standards are indispensable in guiding this process, decision-making is nonetheless susceptible to nonrational factors that can undermined the quality, consistency, and perceived fairness REC decisions. In…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Decision Making, Research Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gillian Houston; Ingrid Lunt – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
In recent decades the doctorate and its purposes have undergone fundamental change. The scholarly model has evolved from one of 'apprentice' to independent, supported learner and the doctoral training process has been revolutionised; many candidates now experience cohort-based, structured research. The UK's final PhD examination, however, has…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Doctoral Degrees, Doctoral Dissertations, Degree Requirements
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  19