Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
MDRC | 2 |
Canadian Journal of Higher… | 1 |
Author
Balu, Rekha | 2 |
DeLaurentis, Micah | 2 |
Rappaport, Shelley | 2 |
Zhu, Pei | 2 |
Murray, Jacqueline | 1 |
Quint, Janet | 1 |
Quint, Janet C. | 1 |
Smith, Thomas J. | 1 |
Summerlee, Alastair | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
Quint, Janet; Zhu, Pei; Balu, Rekha; Rappaport, Shelley; DeLaurentis, Micah – MDRC, 2015
Success for All (SFA), one of the best-known school reform models, aims to improve the reading skills of all children but is especially directed at schools that serve large numbers of students from low-income families. First implemented in 1987, SFA combines a challenging reading program, whole-school reform elements, and an emphasis on continuous…
Descriptors: Models, Educational Change, Program Implementation, Reading Instruction
Quint, Janet C.; Balu, Rekha; DeLaurentis, Micah; Rappaport, Shelley; Smith, Thomas J.; Zhu, Pei – MDRC, 2014
This is the second of three reports from MDRC's evaluation of the Success for All (SFA) scale-up demonstration, funded under the U.S. Department of Education's Investing in Innovation (i3) competition. The report presents updated findings on SFA's implementation and impacts in the scale-up sites participating in the evaluation. The i3 evaluation…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Innovation, Models, Control Groups
Summerlee, Alastair; Murray, Jacqueline – Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 2010
Previously, we reported qualitative findings showing that students who experienced a problem- or enquiry-based course (EBL) in a first-year seminar program had greater confidence in their academic abilities, were more engaged, and were better prepared for upper-year courses. In the current paper, we provide quantitative data to substantiate the…
Descriptors: Control Groups, First Year Seminars, Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis