Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Center for Research in… | 2 |
Grantee Submission | 2 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
RMC Research Corporation | 1 |
Author
Alberg, Marty | 1 |
Askew, Karyl | 1 |
Beam, Margaret | 1 |
Bernstein, Lawrence | 1 |
Bertz, Christine | 1 |
Brenda Gallagher | 1 |
Christine Bertz | 1 |
Faddis, Bonnie | 1 |
Gallagher, Brenda | 1 |
Hunt, Dana | 1 |
Jones, Bridget | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Junior High Schools | 4 |
Middle Schools | 4 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Oral and Written Language… | 1 |
Test of Word Reading… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 6 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 6 |
Kim, Young-Suk Grace – Grantee Submission, 2016
Purpose: The primary aim of the present study was to examine whether different ways of presenting narrative stimuli (i.e., live narrative stimuli versus audio-recorded narrative stimuli) influence children's performances on narrative comprehension and oral-retell quality. Method: Children in kindergarten (n = 54), second grade (n = 74), and fourth…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Audio Equipment, Auditory Stimuli, Comparative Analysis
Zoblotsky, Todd; Bertz, Christine; Gallagher, Brenda; Alberg, Marty – Center for Research in Educational Policy (CREP), 2017
In August 2010, the Smithsonian Science Education Center (SSEC) received a grant of more than $25 million from the U.S. Department of Education's Investing in Innovation (i3) program for a five-year study to validate its Leadership Assistance for Science Education Reform (LASER) model in three very diverse regions of the United States: rural North…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Science Tests, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students
Todd Zoblotsky; Christine Bertz; Brenda Gallagher; Marty Alberg – Center for Research in Educational Policy (CREP), 2016
In August 2010, the Smithsonian Science Education Center (SSEC) received a grant of more than $25 million from the U.S. Department of Education's Investing in Innovation (i3) program for a five-year study to validate its Leadership Assistance for Science Education Reform (LASER) model in three very diverse regions of the United States: rural North…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Science Tests, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students
Askew, Karyl; Stevenson, Olivia; Jones, Bridget – Grantee Submission, 2018
"INSPIRE" is an Investing in Innovation (i3) development grant funded by the Office of Innovation and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. "INSPIRE" provides an innovative integrated K-12 STEM pipeline approach focused on STEM course content and instructional redesign. The INSPIRE model was implemented in Cabarrus County…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Standardized Tests, Mathematics Achievement, Science Achievement
Beam, Margaret; Faddis, Bonnie – RMC Research Corporation, 2012
The purpose of this evaluation of Scholastic's "System 44" conducted by RMC Research was to expand the existing research on students with learning disabilities by conducting a randomized study of struggling readers with approximately half of the sample comprised of students with learning disabilities. Specifically, this evaluation…
Descriptors: Reading Programs, Reading Difficulties, Phonics, Decoding (Reading)
Bernstein, Lawrence; Rappaport, Catherine Dun; Olsho, Lauren; Hunt, Dana; Levin, Marjorie – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2009
This report summarizes the findings from a national evaluation of mentoring programs funded under the U.S. Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program. The impact evaluation used an experimental design in which students were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. Thirty-two purposively selected School Mentoring Programs and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Research Design, School Schedules, Mentors