NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1448433
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2024-Dec
Pages: 18
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0266-4909
EISSN: EISSN-1365-2729
Facilitating Learners' Self-Assessment during Formative Writing Tasks Using Writing Analytics Toolkit
Luzhen Tang; Kejie Shen; Huixiao Le; Yuan Shen; Shufang Tan; Yueying Zhao; Torsten Juelich; Xinyu Li; Dragan Gaševic; Yizhou Fan
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v40 n6 p2822-2839 2024
Background: Learners' writing skills are critical to their academic and professional development. Previous studies have shown that learners' self-assessment during writing is essential for assessing their writing products and monitoring their writing processes. However, conducting practical self-assessments of writing remains challenging for learners without help, such as formative feedback. Objectives: To facilitate learners' self-assessment in writing, we developed a writing analytics toolkit and used data visualisation and cutting-edge machine learning technology that provides real-time and formative feedback to learners. Methods: To investigate whether our newly-developed tool affects the accuracy and process of learners' self-assessment, we conducted a lab study. We assigned 59 learners to complete writing (2 h) and revising (1 h) tasks. During the revision stage, we randomly assigned the learners to two groups: one group used the writing analytics toolkit while the second group was not granted access to the toolkit. Learners' self-assessment accuracy and process of self-assessment were compared between the two groups. Results: In our study, we found the toolkit helped learners in the experimental group improve the self-assessment accuracy of their writing products compared to the learners in the control group. In addition, we also found that the affordances of the toolkit affected the learners' self-assessment process, and poor design affordances may have prevented the learners from reflecting by themselves. Conclusions: Together, our empirical study shed light on the design of future writing analytics tools which aim at improving learners' self-assessment during formative writing processes.
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2191/en-us
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A