Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Cheng, Fei-Wen | 1 |
Combs, Warren E. | 1 |
Hartnett, Carolyn G. | 1 |
King, James R. | 1 |
Smith, William L. | 1 |
Spivey, Nancy Nelson | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cheng, Fei-Wen – Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 2009
Students' interpretations of their academic writing tasks has been a central concern in the cognitive-based writing research due to the prominent role such decision-making plays in determining students' subsequent thinking and composing strategies and ultimately in shaping their textual quality. Without a comprehensive understanding of how L2…
Descriptors: College Seniors, Writing Research, Writing Instruction, Academic Discourse
Hartnett, Carolyn G. – 1988
A pilot study explored how to teach students to write thoughtfully, and also how to teach computers to recognize and interpret the kinds of thinking that appear in such writings. First, a taxonomy of mental processes was found, next the linguistic expressions (clues) that indicate the processes were hypothesized, and then a professionally-written…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Classification, Computer Uses in Education, Cues

Combs, Warren E.; Smith, William L. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1980
Experiments conducted with freshman composition students suggested that (1) the repeated use of a control stimulus passage does not result in increased syntactic complexity; (2) both overt and covert cues elicit more complex writing than do no-cue situations; and (3) the effect of overt cues seems to be retained, at least across a short duration.…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Cues, Difficulty Level, Higher Education

Spivey, Nancy Nelson; King, James R. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1989
Analyzes above and below average readers' informational reports, which synthesize both source texts and writer-generated materials. Concludes that general reading ability and success at synthesizing overlap, and that success at synthesis may be related to cognitive factors associated with comprehension, such as sensitivity to text structure. (RS)
Descriptors: Cues, Grade 10, Grade 6, Grade 8