Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biology | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| STEM Education | 1 |
| Scaffolding (Teaching… | 1 |
| Science Instruction | 1 |
| Sentences | 1 |
| Teaching Methods | 1 |
| Technical Writing | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| Undergraduate Study | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Biological… | 1 |
Author
| Dirrigl, Frank J., Jr. | 1 |
| Noe, Mark | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirrigl, Frank J., Jr.; Noe, Mark – Journal of Biological Education, 2014
Teaching scientific writing in biology classes is challenging for both students and instructors. This article offers and reviews several useful "toolkit" items that improve student writing. These include sentence and paper-length templates, funnelling and compartmentalisation, and preparing compendiums of corrections. In addition,…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Undergraduate Study, Technical Writing, Biology
