Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Higher Education | 176 |
Writing Evaluation | 176 |
Writing Improvement | 176 |
Writing Instruction | 109 |
Writing Skills | 52 |
Writing Research | 49 |
Writing Processes | 46 |
Teaching Methods | 44 |
Teacher Student Relationship | 31 |
Revision (Written Composition) | 30 |
Writing (Composition) | 28 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Berkenkotter, Carol | 2 |
Flower, Linda | 2 |
Hawisher, Gail E. | 2 |
Hayes, John R. | 2 |
Lavelle, Ellen | 2 |
Pedersen, Elray L. | 2 |
Smith, Carl, Ed. | 2 |
Adams, Ronald | 1 |
Alexander, John | 1 |
Areej Lhothali | 1 |
Autrey, Ken | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 43 |
Teachers | 35 |
Students | 4 |
Researchers | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tahani I. Aldosemani; Hussein Assalahi; Areej Lhothali; Maram Albsisi – International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2023
This paper explores the literature on AWE feedback, particularly its perceived impact on enhancing EFL student writing proficiency. Prior research highlighted the contribution of AWE in fostering learner autonomy and alleviating teacher workloads, with a substantial focus on student engagement with AWE feedback. This review strives to illuminate…
Descriptors: Automation, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, English (Second Language)
Jing Yan; Yu Zhu; Xinrong Ye – SAGE Open, 2024
Research on how peer feedback affects second language (L2) writing in higher education has been limited. This study examines the impact of peer feedback on revision and literature review writing in learners of Chinese as an L2 at a university in mainland China. The study analyzed feedback, revisions, and writing performance of 30 students. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Literature Reviews
Taghizadeh Kerman, Nafiseh; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem; Noroozi, Omid – International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2022
In this article, we aim to explore the differences in the received peer feedback among successful, less successful, and unsuccessful students in higher education. This exploratory study was conducted in online settings and in the context of argumentative essay writing. In total, 135 undergraduate students participated in an online module and they…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Essays, Persuasive Discourse
Lu, Zhihong; Li, Xiaowei; Li, Zhenxiao – Research-publishing.net, 2015
The effective design and use of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools in developing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' writing skill and learner autonomy have remained great challenges for system designers, developers, and EFL instructors compared with that of the pencil-paper writing in the context of regular teacher-fronted…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Automation, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Hight, Jim D. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Journaling is an effective tool for the development of writing skills and creative thinking; however, research has not revealed how it improves writing skills in the college classroom. The majority of the studies related to journaling are elementary school studies, which do not provide statistics on how journaling can improve writing skills for…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, College Freshmen, Higher Education, Journal Writing
Li, Jinrui; Barnard, Roger – Assessing Writing, 2011
Teachers' feedback on students' written work is an important aspect of pedagogy. However, theoretical views differ on what constitutes "good" feedback, both among applied linguists and academics in other disciplines. In-depth research needs to be carried out into the contextual difficulties of evaluating and assessing academic…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Assignments, Research Needs, Writing Evaluation

Noe, Marcia – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1988
Offers heresies about reading, grading, and commenting on student papers which may relieve teachers from constant paper grading. Recommends using peer audiences, deemphasizing grading, expanding and elaborating the stages of the composing process, and modeling effective writing behaviors for students. (RAE)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Secondary Education, Teaching Methods, Writing Evaluation

Grimm, Nancy – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Presents guidelines given to students to help make peer group discussions of writing more effective. (HTH)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Ewald, Helen Rothchild – Writing Instructor, 1984
Offers suggestions for reinforcing the teaching of writing as process by approaching the evaluation of writing as process. (FL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education, Writing Evaluation

Reinstein, Alan; Trebby, James P. – Journal of Education for Business, 1997
Strategies for strengthening the writing skills of accounting students include the following: beginning with critical thinking as a prerequisite to effective writing; teaching the elements of composing and editing; and using "microthemes" assignments. (SK)
Descriptors: Accounting, Critical Thinking, Editing, Higher Education

Dyer, Jack L.; And Others – Journal of Education for Business, 1994
Holistic scoring enables the evaluation of writing skills based on general impressions of content and style. An experiment in an accounting class shows how it can be applied successfully with a high degree of reliability. (SK)
Descriptors: Accounting, Higher Education, Holistic Evaluation, Interrater Reliability

Carter, Ron; Rockson, Thomas A., Jr. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1998
Describes a grading system used in a college composition class that shifts the focus away from letter grades and toward continuous student progress. Describes how it is based on a personalized, flexible standard that challenges each student's particular skills as a writer, and encourages real improvement in student writing. (SR)
Descriptors: Flexible Progression, Grading, Higher Education, Individualized Instruction

Boiarsky, Carolyn – Journal of Advanced Composition, 1991
Investigates the effects of word processing on student's compositions to untangle the seemingly contradictory findings of earlier research. Finds that students are increasing their fluidity and fluency while simultaneously failing to organize and focus their increased verbiage. (RS)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Word Processing, Writing Evaluation

Sloan, Gary – College Composition and Communication, 1990
Compares writing errors made by college freshmen and professional writers. Explains that 20 student essays were compared to 20 essays from the students' textbook, "Short Takes: Model Essays for Composition." Notes that students and professionals were almost equally prone to commit errors. Offers suggestions for improving student writing.…
Descriptors: Authors, Comparative Analysis, Essays, Freshman Composition
Resnick, Daniel P.; Myers, Miles – Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 1992
Describes the goals of the New Standards Project, and the first Writing Calibration Workshop at the Sagamore on Lake George in New York. Asserts that the workshop experiment shows that there is enough agreement among English teachers to consider developing a system of common standards that does not depend upon a single examination. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Teacher Education, Teacher Improvement, Writing Evaluation