Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Instructional Effectiveness | 3 |
| Phonics | 3 |
| Word Recognition | 3 |
| Alphabets | 2 |
| Beginning Reading | 2 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 2 |
| English Language Learners | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Kindergarten | 2 |
| Literacy Education | 2 |
| Orthographic Symbols | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Sanders, Elizabeth A. | 3 |
| Vadasy, Patricia F. | 3 |
| Jenkins, Joseph R. | 1 |
| Peyton, Julia A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Kindergarten | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Direct linkVadasy, Patricia F.; Sanders, Elizabeth A. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2021
Two experiments explored rates for introducing grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) and the types of correspondences taught for optimal alphabet and early literacy skills learning. In both studies, children entered with minimal alphabet knowledge and were randomly assigned within classrooms to one of two treatments delivered individually over…
Descriptors: Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, Literacy Education, Kindergarten, Grade 1
Download full textVadasy, Patricia F.; Sanders, Elizabeth A. – Grantee Submission, 2020
Two experiments explored rates for introducing grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) and the types of correspondences taught for optimal alphabet and early literacy skills learning. In both studies, children entered with minimal alphabet knowledge and were randomly assigned within classrooms to one of two treatments delivered individually over…
Descriptors: Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, Literacy Education, Kindergarten, Grade 1
Peer reviewedVadasy, Patricia F.; Sanders, Elizabeth A.; Peyton, Julia A.; Jenkins, Joseph R. – Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 2002
A study compared students at risk for reading disabilities who were provided phonics-based instruction in first grade (n=13), students tutored in comprehension skills in second grade (n=10), and students tutored in both grades (n=26). Students tutored only in first grade performed better than those also tutored in second grade. (Contains…
Descriptors: High Risk Students, Instructional Effectiveness, Phonics, Primary Education
