NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 32 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Buchin, Zachary L.; West, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
The testing effect is 1 of several memory effects moderated by experimental design, such that the effect on free recall is larger in a mixed-list than pure-list design (Mulligan, Susser, & Smith, 2016). The current experiments assess hypotheses regarding why this pattern is found. Three extant accounts of design effects (Nguyen & McDaniel,…
Descriptors: Testing, Research Design, Recall (Psychology), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McDaniel, Mark A.; Cahill, Michael J.; Bugg, Julie M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
How does orthographic distinctiveness affect recall of structured (categorized) word lists? On one theory, enhanced item-specific information (e.g., more distinct encoding) in concert with robust relational information (e.g., categorical information) optimally supports free recall. This predicts that for categorically structured lists,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Recall (Psychology), Word Lists, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hunt, R. Reed; Smith, Rebekah E.; Toth, Jeffrey P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
The experiments reported here were designed to replicate and extend McCabe, Roediger, and Karpicke's (2011) finding that retrieval in category cued recall involves both controlled and automatic processes. The extension entailed identifying whether distinctive encoding affected 1 or both of these 2 processes. The first experiment successfully…
Descriptors: Cues, Recall (Psychology), Memory, Experimental Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kliegl, Oliver; Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
This study sought to determine whether nonselective retrieval practice after study can reduce memories' susceptibility to intralist interference, as it is observed in the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting. Across 3 experiments, we compared the effects of nonselective retrieval practice and restudy on…
Descriptors: Memory, Interference (Learning), Comparative Analysis, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jacoby, Larry L.; Wahlheim, Christopher N.; Kelley, Colleen M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Three experiments contrasted recollection of change with differentiation as means of avoiding retroactive interference and proactive interference. We manipulated the extent to which participants looked back to notice change between pairs of cues and targets (A-B, A-D) and measured the effects on later cued recall of either the first or second…
Descriptors: Memory, Interference (Learning), Cues, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soderstrom, Nicholas C.; Clark, Colin T.; Halamish, Vered; Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
A frequent procedure used to study how individuals monitor their own learning is to collect judgments of learning (JOLs) during acquisition, considered to be important, in part, because such judgments are assumed to guide how individuals allocate their future learning resources. In such research, however, a tacit assumption is frequently made:…
Descriptors: Memory, Experimental Psychology, Metacognition, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popp, Earl Y.; Serra, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Recent research suggests that human memory systems evolved to remember animate things better than inanimate things. In the present experiments, we examined whether these effects occur for both free recall and cued recall. In Experiment 1, we directly compared the effect of animacy on free recall and cued recall. Participants studied lists of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Recall (Psychology), Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hupbach, Almut; Sahakyan, Lili – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
The attempt to forget some recently encoded information renders this information difficult to recall in a subsequent memory test. "Forget" instructions are only effective when followed by learning of new material. In the present study, we asked whether the new material needs to match the format of the to-be-forgotten information for…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Visual Stimuli, Word Lists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wahlheim, Christopher N.; Maddox, Geoffrey B.; Jacoby, Larry L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Three experiments examined the role of study-phase retrieval (reminding) in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall. Remindings were brought under task control to evaluate their effects. Participants studied 2 lists of word pairs containing 3 item types: single items that appeared once in List 2, within-list repetitions that appeared…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cues, Recall (Psychology), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wissman, Kathryn T.; Rawson, Katherine A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
The current research evaluated the extent to which the grain size of recall practice for lengthy text material affects recall during practice and subsequent memory. The "grain size hypothesis" states that a smaller vs. larger grain size will increase retrieval success during practice that in turn will enhance subsequent memory for…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Experimental Psychology, Memory, Drills (Practice)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ball, B. Hunter; DeWitt, Michael R.; Knight, Justin B.; Hicks, Jason L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
The current study sought to examine the relative contributions of encoding and retrieval processes in accessing contextual information in the absence of item memory using an extralist cuing procedure in which the retrieval cues used to query memory for contextual information were "related" to the target item but never actually studied.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Experimental Psychology, Memory, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hanczakowski, Maciej; Mazzoni, Giuliana – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is the finding of impaired memory performance for information stored in long-term memory due to retrieval of a related set of information. This phenomenon is often assigned to operations of a specialized mechanism recruited to resolve interference during retrieval by deactivating competing memory representations.…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Memory, Interference (Learning), Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peterson, Daniel J.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Across 3 experiments, we investigated the factors that dictate when taking a test improves subsequent memory performance (the "testing effect"). In Experiment 1, participants retrieving a set of targets during a retrieval practice phase ultimately recalled fewer of those targets compared with a group of participants who studied the…
Descriptors: Memory, Experimental Psychology, Tests, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Unsworth, Nash; Brewer, Gene A.; Spillers, Gregory J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Targeting information in long-term memory is an important cognitive ability, but one that is not well understood. In this study, 4 experiments were conducted to examine the influence of proactive and retroactive interference on memory targeting. Participants were given either 1 or 2 lists and asked to recall List 1, List 2, or in some cases both…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Interference (Learning), Memory, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weller, Peter D.; Anderson, Michael C.; Gómez-Ariza, Carlos J.; Bajo, M. Teresa – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Retrieving memories can impair recall of other related traces. Items affected by this retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) are often less accessible when tested with independent probes, a characteristic known as cue independence. Cue independence has been interpreted as evidence for inhibitory mechanisms that suppress competing items during…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Memory, Cues, Inhibition
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3