NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Forrest, Charlotte L. D.; Monsell, Stephen; McLaren, Ian P. L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Task-cuing experiments are usually intended to explore control of task set. But when small stimulus sets are used, they plausibly afford learning of the response associated with a combination of cue and stimulus, without reference to tasks. In 3 experiments we presented the typical trials of a task-cuing experiment: a cue (colored shape) followed,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cues, Visual Stimuli, Color
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Longman, Cai S.; Lavric, Aureliu; Monsell, Stephen – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Switching tasks prolongs response times, an effect reduced but not eliminated by active preparation. To explore the role of attentional selection of the relevant stimulus attribute in these task-switch costs, we measured eye fixations in participants cued to identify either a face or a letter displayed on its forehead. With only 200 ms between cue…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Eye Movements, Attention, Reaction Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van 't Wout, Félice; Lavric, Aureliu; Monsell, Stephen – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Accounts of task-set control generally assume that the current task's stimulus-response (S-R) rules must be elevated to a privileged state of activation. How are they represented in this state? In 3 task-cuing experiments, we tested the hypothesis that phonological working memory is used to represent S-R rules for task-set control by getting…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cues, Stimuli, Phonology