NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Higher Education Opportunity…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 30 of 273 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelley A. Packalen; Kate Rowbotham – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
Using multivariate regression, we identified situational, personal and contextual variables correlated with business students' self-reported rates of academic misconduct. The most influential predictors of increasing academic misconduct were: higher estimates of peers' academic misconduct, increasingly negative perceptions of the program's…
Descriptors: Integrity, Cheating, Ethics, Plagiarism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Melvin Prince; Emma Wang – Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2024
Past studies of academic dishonesty typically have been grounded in the theory of planned behaviour. Key predictors of academic dishonesty variables under this framework generally have been attitudes towards academic dishonesty, the impact of peer pressure to engage in such acts, and individual perceptions of related acts. However, planned…
Descriptors: Integrity, Cheating, Ethics, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pokorny, Annika; Ballen, Cissy J.; Drake, Abby Grace; Driessen, Emily P.; Fagbodun, Sheritta; Gibbens, Brian; Henning, Jeremiah A.; McCoy, Sophie J.; Thompson, Seth K.; Willis, Charles G.; Lane, A. Kelly – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Efforts to discourage academic misconduct in online learning environments frequently include the use of remote proctoring services. While these services are relatively commonplace in undergraduate science courses, there are open questions about students' remote assessment environments and their concerns related to remote proctoring services. Using…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Cheating, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rangkuti, Anna A.; Royanto, Lucia R. M.; Santoso, Guritnaningsih A. – Issues in Educational Research, 2022
Peer reporting, defined as a lateral control effort by reporting witnessed academic dishonesty, is one method used to foster academic integrity. However, most students refrain from reporting. This study portrays the process of peer reporting intention based on an ethical decision-making perspective in two types of academic dishonesty (exam…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Plagiarism, Student Behavior
Dench, Daniel L.; Joyce, Theodore J. – National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022
The rapid increase in online instruction in higher education has heightened concerns about cheating. We use a randomized control design to test whether informing students that we can detect plagiarism reduces cheating. We further test whether informing students they have been caught cheating reduces subsequent cheating. We find informing students…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Undergraduate Students, Plagiarism, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adama, Esther Abena; Graf, Amanda; Adusei-Asante, Kwadwo; Afrifa-Yamoah, Ebenezer – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Background: COVID-19 and its associated restrictions called for innovations in higher education teaching and learning space with many universities resorting to online teaching and alternative assessments. However, little has been done to understand the academic integrity implications in alternative online and non-invigilated assessments. Aim: This…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Alternative Assessment, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dremova, Oksana; Maloshonok, Natalia; Terentev, Evgeniy; Federiakin, Denis – European Journal of Higher Education, 2023
Despite university efforts to create honour codes and a culture of integrity, student academic dishonesty remains a widespread problem around the world. Previous theoretical and methodological approaches, which informed the development of measures for the prevention of dishonest behaviour, focus only on student justifications of academic…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Integrity, Cheating, Plagiarism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yovav Eshet; Keren Grinautsky; Pnina Steinberger – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
Despite the growing interest in mindfulness in higher education, the literature on its relation to decision-making under risk (i.e. academic misconduct) and statistics anxiety is scarce. The present research shall fill this gap. Based on the prospect theory, we assessed the mediating effect of mindfulness on the relationship between statistics…
Descriptors: Ethics, Anxiety, Cheating, Integrity
Robert Louis DeFranco – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Academic dishonesty poses a challenge for the online and campus-based learning environment where technology and assessment at a distance may encourage easy and innovative ways of cheating. The purpose of this quantitative study was to assess campus-based and online students' attitudes and perceptions toward academic dishonesty. Data were collected…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Ethics, Integrity
Josh Freeman – Higher Education Policy Institute, 2024
This new Policy Note by HEPI and Kortext explores students' attitudes to AI. Based on a poll of 1,250 students through UCAS, we build a picture of the way students use and view generative AI technologies like ChatGPT and Google Bard. We find that the use of generative AI has become normalised in higher education, but that universities have so far…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Natural Language Processing
Timothy K. Daty – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Academic dishonesty among college students has been an enduring issue within higher education. While prior research has explored this issue, the recent global pandemic has shifted collegiate demographics dramatically, particularly within online courses. As a result, previous findings may prove less applicable, warranting new research into student…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Online Courses, Criminology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Waltzer, Talia; Dahl, Audun – Journal of Moral Education, 2021
As they navigate academic life, students must decide whether the acts of copying they encounter constitute plagiarism, and whether those acts are wrong. The present study investigated students' perceptions, evaluations, and reasoning about copying. In interviews about hypothetical scenarios involving copying, undergraduates (N = 60) reported…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Plagiarism, Ethics, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Benyo, Ahmed; Alkhaza'leh, Bilal Ayed; Kumar, Tribhuwan – World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 2022
This study aims to emphasize students' views on using unfair means in e-learning programmes in English at undergraduate level. The research examines further how they trick, why they trick, and possible approaches to decrease this unfair practice. This investigation was carried out after the second half of 2020 when the whole world was witnessing…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Electronic Learning, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DiPaulo, Donald – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2022
Research has found that academic dishonesty (AD) is common among college and university undergraduate students worldwide (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2021). Two variables found to have a significant effect on student cheating were students' attitudes toward AD and perceptions of peer engagement in AD (McCabe et al., 2012). This…
Descriptors: Cheating, Undergraduate Students, Ethics, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emerson, David J.; Smith, Kenneth J. – Accounting Education, 2022
The recent pandemic necessitated a migration to online instruction leading to concerns regarding the integrity of online assessments as a result of the presence of fee-based websites that disseminate answers to students. We validated this concern by evaluating student performance on an online quiz where some of the questions had easily searchable…
Descriptors: Homework, Web Sites, Educational Technology, Cheating
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  19