NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Croskerry, Pat; Campbell, Samuel G.; Petrie, David A. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2023
The historical tendency to view medicine as both an art and a science may have contributed to a disinclination among clinicians towards cognitive science. In particular, this has had an impact on the approach towards the diagnostic process which is a barometer of clinical decision-making behaviour and is increasingly seen as a yardstick of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Science, Clinical Diagnosis, Medical Evaluation, Medicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sampaio, Cristina; Wang, Ranxiao Frances – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
People's expectations help them make judgments about the world. In the area of spatial memory, the interaction of existing knowledge with incoming information is best illustrated in the category effect, a bias in positioning a target toward the prototypical location of its region (Huttenlocher et al., 1991). According to Bayesian principles, these…
Descriptors: Expectation, Probability, Spatial Ability, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clikeman, Paul M.; Stevens, Jerry L. – Journal of Education for Business, 2019
Managerial accounting teaches students to make rational decisions by evaluating sunk costs, incremental costs, and opportunity costs. The behavioral literature suggests that biases and heuristics overcome rational thinking. The authors explore whether learning cost concepts attenuates behavioral biases. They find a statistically significant…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Accounting, Business Administration Education, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephens, Rachel G.; Dunn, John C.; Hayes, Brett K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
When asked to determine whether a syllogistic argument is deductively valid, people are influenced by their prior beliefs about the believability of the conclusion. Recently, two competing explanations for this belief bias effect have been proposed, each based on signal detection theory (SDT). Under a response bias explanation, people set more…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Bias, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Calvillo, Dustin P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
One component of hindsight bias is memory distortion. This component is measured with a memory design, in which individuals answer questions, learn the correct answers, and recall their original answers. Hindsight bias occurs when participants' recollections are closer to the correct answers than their original judgments actually were. The present…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Bias, Memory, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trippas, Dries; Handley, Simon J.; Verde, Michael F. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
When people evaluate conclusions, they are often influenced by prior beliefs. Prevalent theories claim that "belief bias" affects the quality of syllogistic reasoning. However, recent work by Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010) has suggested that belief bias may be a simple response bias. In Experiment 1, receiver operating characteristic…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Bias, Logical Thinking, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaplan, Jennifer K. – Journal of Statistics Education, 2009
Psychologists have discovered a phenomenon called "Belief Bias" in which subjects rate the strength of arguments based on the believability of the conclusions. This paper reports the results of a small qualitative pilot study of undergraduate students who had previously taken an algebra-based introduction to statistics class. The subjects in this…
Descriptors: Psychologists, Beliefs, Bias, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Russo, J. Edward; Carlson, Kurt A.; Meloy, Margaret G.; Yong, Kevyn – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2008
Why, during a decision between new alternatives, do people bias their evaluations of information to support a tentatively preferred option? The authors test the following 3 decision process goals as the potential drivers of such distortion of information: (a) to reduce the effort of evaluating new information, (b) to increase the separation…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluative Thinking, Prompting, Objectives