Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Faculty Promotion | 9 |
| Tenure | 9 |
| Theater Arts | 9 |
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 6 |
| Departments | 3 |
| College Faculty | 2 |
| College Programs | 2 |
| Speech Communication | 2 |
| Administrator Responsibility | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Whitmore, Jon | 2 |
| Becker, Samuel L. | 1 |
| Boehm, Lisa Krissoff | 1 |
| Grady, Sharon | 1 |
| Headrick, Charlotte J. | 1 |
| Larrivee, Linda S. | 1 |
| Rosenberg, Donald L. | 1 |
| Whitmore, Jon, Ed. | 1 |
| Yeomans, G. Allen | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Massachusetts | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBoehm, Lisa Krissoff; Larrivee, Linda S. – Metropolitan Universities, 2016
This paper analyzes the processes and outcomes involved with mentoring junior faculty in the reappointment, promotion, and tenure (RPT) process at a comprehensive state university and creating a culture supportive of engaged research. Although the university in this case study is governed by a collective bargaining agreement that prohibits the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Mentors, Faculty Promotion, Tenure
Yeomans, G. Allen – Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 1984
Provides guidelines for promotion and tenure deliberations. (PD)
Descriptors: Departments, Faculty Promotion, Guidelines, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRosenberg, Donald L. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews attempts of the academic theater community to develop a system to assess creative activity as a legitimate component for promotion and tenure decisions. (MM)
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWhitmore, Jon – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Focuses on the issue of deciding whether or not to place theatre specialists on tenure track, non-tenure track, guest artist, or staff lines. Lists factors which require analysis, such as type of institution, departmental mission, departmental size, and requirements for promotion and tenure. (MS)
Descriptors: Departments, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, Program Administration
Peer reviewedHeadrick, Charlotte J. – ACA Bulletin, 1991
Discusses the uses and misuses of teacher evaluations. Opposes their use in a statistical way to evaluate promotion and tenure decisions and their awkwardness for the evaluation of theater artists. (SR)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship
Peer reviewedWhitmore, Jon – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Presents recommendations of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force, addressing the issue of faculty workload. Suggests several questions to form the basis for discussions on this issue. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewedBecker, Samuel L.; And Others – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Surveyed administrators of theatre programs to determine the importance and value of artistic work by theatre faculty to institutional goals and in tenure decisions. Found (1) great variations in the degree to which artistic quality is valued and (2) dissatisfaction with the criteria and procedures for evaluating theatre faculty. (PD)
Descriptors: Administrators, Art, College Programs, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedGrady, Sharon – Stage of the Art, 1999
Synthesizes the central themes from a session on how theatre educators can survive in academia which took place at the 1998 AATE (American Alliance for Theatre and Education) conference. Presents the "Top Ten Suggestions for Surviving in Academia," including the following suggestions: clarify what is expected, to whom faculty are responsible, and…
Descriptors: Career Planning, Collegiality, Employer Employee Relationship, Faculty Development
Whitmore, Jon, Ed. – 1988
Based on a workshop for theatre department chairs, guidance on administrative and departmental responsibilities are provided in the following chapters: (1) "Chairs and Deans: Working Together" (J. Robert Wills); (2) "Faculty Evaluation" (Patti P. Gillespie); (3) "Evaluation for Promotion and Tenure" (James M. Symons); (4) "Production Program…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Budgeting, College Curriculum, College Faculty
