NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 74 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hwanggyu Lim; Danqi Zhu; Edison M. Choe; Kyung T. Han – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2024
This study presents a generalized version of the residual differential item functioning (RDIF) detection framework in item response theory, named GRDIF, to analyze differential item functioning (DIF) in multiple groups. The GRDIF framework retains the advantages of the original RDIF framework, such as computational efficiency and ease of…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Bias, Test Reliability, Test Construction
Areekkuzhiyil, Santhosh – Online Submission, 2021
Assessment is an integral part of any teaching learning process. Assessment has large number of functions to perform, whether it is formative or summative. This paper analyse the issues involved and the areas of concern in the classroom assessment practice and discusses the recent reforms take place. [This paper was published in Edutracks v20 n8…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Shiyu; Lin, Haiyan; Chang, Hua-Hua; Douglas, Jeff – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and multistage testing (MST) have become two of the most popular modes in large-scale computer-based sequential testing. Though most designs of CAT and MST exhibit strength and weakness in recent large-scale implementations, there is no simple answer to the question of which design is better because different…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Format, Sequential Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diket, Read M.; Xu, Lihua; Brewer, Thomas M. – Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, 2014
The aspirational model resulted from the authors' secondary analysis of the Mother/Child (M/C) test block from the 2008 National Assessment of Educational Progress restricted data that examined the responses of the national sample of 8th-grade students (n = 1648). This test block presented no artmaking task and consisted of the same 13 questions…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Art Education, Grade 8, National Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bennett, Rita – ELT Journal, 2012
This study looks at the real and perceived effects of inter-candidate variation in linguistic ability during pair-tested oral examinations in a southern Italian context. Pair testing has not been taken up in schools and universities in southern Italy despite its wide use in international testing systems. Colleagues and prospective candidates often…
Descriptors: Test Results, Linguistics, Oral Language, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jaime Pastor, Asuncion; Perez Guillot, Cristina; Candel-Mora, Miguel A. – Language Learning in Higher Education, 2012
One of the main problems relating to language courses offered at language centres is measuring the students' entry-level skills in a fast, efficient and reliable way. This problem is particularly acute in language centres with large numbers of students, especially at the beginning of the academic year, as a mechanism has to be implemented which…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Student Placement, Prior Learning, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zilberberg, Anna; Anderson, Robin D.; Finney, Sara J.; Marsh, Kimberly R. – Educational Assessment, 2013
In the United States, government mandates for educational accountability have prompted an increase in testing in K-12 and higher education settings, resulting in a generation of millennial students who have undergone repeated assessment over the course of their educational careers. The cumulative effects of testing may range from increasingly…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Attitudes, Accountability, Attitude Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Galaczi, Evelina D.; ffrench, Angela; Hubbard, Chris; Green, Anthony – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2011
The process of constructing assessment scales for performance testing is complex and multi-dimensional. As a result, a number of different approaches, both empirically and intuitively based, are open to developers. In this paper we outline the approach taken in the revision of a set of assessment scales used with speaking tests, and present the…
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Research Methodology, Foreign Countries, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Sooyeon; Walker, Michael E.; McHale, Frederick – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2010
In this study we examined variations of the nonequivalent groups equating design for tests containing both multiple-choice (MC) and constructed-response (CR) items to determine which design was most effective in producing equivalent scores across the two tests to be equated. Using data from a large-scale exam, this study investigated the use of…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Scoring, Equated Scores, Test Bias
Kieffer, Michael J.; Rivera, Mabel; Francis, David J. – Center on Instruction, 2012
This report presents results from a new quantitative synthesis of research on the effectiveness and validity of test accommodations for English language learners (ELLs) taking large-scale assessments. In 2006, the Center on Instruction published a review of the literature on test accommodations for ELLs titled "Practical Guidelines for the…
Descriptors: Testing Accommodations, English Language Learners, Evidence, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wanous, Mohammed; Procter, Brian; Murshid, Kinaz – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2009
It is widely accepted that assessment has a great influence on the quality of learning. Assessment can be a powerful tool for improving students' learning and motivation. It also helps in developing a positive and supportive learning environment. The present paper briefly outlines the original assessment arrangements for a cross-department…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Skill Development, Engineering Education, Science Process Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Revere, Lee; Elden, Max; Bartsch, Robert – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2008
This study examines a method to decrease social loafing in a group examination. Students who met in teams during the semester took an exam in groups. Rules for the exam, based on the Jeopardy game show, facilitated both group and individual accountability. Feedback from students indicated that compared to a class that did not have group exams,…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Test Construction, Feedback (Response), Cooperative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Menne, John W.; Tolsma, Robert J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Group Testing, Item Analysis, Psychometrics
Beard, Jean – 1970
The major purpose of this study was to determine whether science process achievement tests could be developed which could be administered to groups of primary grade pupils. Tests developed were a series of 35mm color slides which illustrated laboratory situations involving basic science processes. The slides were synchronized with a tape recording…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Elementary School Science, Evaluation, Group Testing
Glaser, Robert; Cox, Richard C. – 1968
Achievement tests may be either norm-referenced or criterion-referenced. The norm-referenced test indicates an individual's proficiency level with respect to other individuals. A criterion-referenced test measures an individual's performance with respect to a specific level along the continuum of attainment. Further, an achievement test may be…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Measurement Techniques
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5