Descriptor
| Feedback | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Test Anxiety | 2 |
| Test Wiseness | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Concurrent Validity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Optometric… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAbplanalp, Paul – Journal of Optometric Education, 1995
When multiple-choice answer sheets are printed in the latent-image format, students may be required to select alternatives until they identify the correct one. This provides immediate feedback and permits use of more complicated test formats, but it also introduces novel ways to cheat and may engender substantial anxiety in test-takers unless…
Descriptors: Cheating, Classroom Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Feedback
Vispoel, Walter P.; And Others – 1992
The effects of review options (the opportunity for examinees to review and change answers) on the magnitude, reliability, efficiency, and concurrent validity of scores obtained from three types of computerized vocabulary tests (fixed item, adaptive, and self-adapted) were studied. Subjects were 97 college students at a large midwestern university…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
