NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Location
Canada1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Dickson, Kevin; Johnston, Nick; McMillan, Heather; Schwieger, Dana; Stovall, Steven – Information Systems Education Journal, 2021
The evolving landscape of higher education has forced many institutions to reorganize, remove administrative layers, and subsequently, reexamine criteria and processes. In particular, efforts to consolidate and combine departments has prompted a need to explore options for a systematic and objective framework for evaluating performance. This paper…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chitpin, Stephanie – International Journal of Educational Management, 2015
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to utilize the Objective Knowledge Growth Framework (OKGF) to promote a better understanding of the evaluating tenure and promotion processes. Design/Methodology/Approach: A scenario is created to illustrate the concept of using OKGF. Findings: The framework aims to support decision makers in identifying the…
Descriptors: Tenure, Decision Making, Dismissal (Personnel), Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Johnston, Pattie C.; Schimmel, Tammy; O'Hara, Hunter – College Quarterly, 2010
University faculty is typically evaluated on their teaching, service and scholarship. Recent literature, faculty comment and legal rulings have called for the inclusion of collegiality as a fourth evaluation category. Collegiality may be thought of as any extra-role behaviour that represents individuals' behaviour that is discretionary, not…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Academic Freedom, Collegiality, College Faculty
Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah – Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2010
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) has hosted two meetings to explore how peer review relates to scholarly communication and academic values. In preparation for an April 2010 workshop, four working papers were developed and circulated. They…
Descriptors: Tenure, Costs, College Faculty, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Herzog, Serge – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2008
Among the varied analytical challenges institutional researchers face, examining faculty pay may be one of the most vexing. Although the literature on faculty compensation analysis dates back to the 1970s (Loeb and Ferber, 1971; Gordon, Morton, and Braden, 1974; Scott, 1977; Braskamp and Johnson, 1978; McLaughlin, Smart, and Montgomery, 1978),…
Descriptors: Teacher Salaries, Land Grant Universities, Compensation (Remuneration), Workers Compensation
Gelmon, Sherril B.; Lederer, Miriam; Seifer, Sarena D.; Wong, Kristine – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The findings of the evaluation of the three-year Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative are presented, describing changes in institutional capacity for community-engaged scholarship, and changes in promotion and tenure policies and processes. The change process in the participating institutions is assessed using the Kotter model of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, College Faculty, Teacher Role, Educational Principles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hellweg, Susan A.; Churchman, David A. – Planning for Higher Education, 1981
A model for minimizing or eradicating the weaknesses of the tenure system is offered. The model is designed to be responsive to the needs of higher education, specifically in providing for academic accountability. The system proposed makes decisions about pay, rank, and tenure independent of one another. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides
Freeman, Elmer; Gust, Susan; Aloshen, Deborah – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
Communities across our nation--whether geographic, ethnic, or issue-based in their composition--are struggling to be healthy, to grow, and thrive. The production of knowledge and the sharing of knowledge by both the community and the higher education institution is the key to helping our communities improve. Retaining and valuing community-engaged…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Faculty Promotion, Tenure, Partnerships in Education
Linnell, Robert H.; Gray, Paul – Journal of the College and University Personnel Assoc., 1977
The use of a model to examine the impact of affirmative action policies on the female/male ratio of a faculty of natural sciences is reported. Increased analysis and detailed study of suggested alternatives can lead to better resolution of the problems and potentials of affirmative action programs. (LBH)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Females
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katula, Richard A.; Doody, Agnes – ACA Bulletin, 1990
Suggests an alternative to the publish or perish model of faculty promotion and tenure (the "collegiality model") in which teaching evaluation is systematic and on-going and scholarly activity (required from all faculty) is defined broadly to allow for individual inclination and yet be equitable. (SR)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCartt, Anne Taylor – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1986
Social Judgment Analysis, a formal decision model, is used to develop a decision support system that provides documentation on faculty accomplishments to assist faculties in making personnel decisions that are systematic, explicit, consistent, and retraceable. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Computer Oriented Programs, Decision Making
Grasha, Tony – 1972
An overview of current approaches and perspectives for assessing faculty performance is presented. The evaluation principles and models are applicable for assessment goals of providing classroom feedback to an instructor, developing promotion, tenure and reappointment procedures, and offering an interface between faculty assessment and career…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
A procedure for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation program is described with examples of various components. Procedures for implementing such a program are discussed. Determining and weighting faculty roles, defining roles and gaining information, and arriving at a matrix are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Ishler, Richard E. – 1981
Policies and procedures for retrenchment used at Emporia State University, Kansas, are identified to serve as a model for other colleges and the universities. The procedures are as follows: When a formal, institution-wide program of retrenchment appears necessary, the president will inform the faculty senate when such action is to be initiated and…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, College Governing Councils, College Presidents
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2