Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 11 |
Guidelines | 11 |
Tenure | 11 |
Faculty Promotion | 9 |
College Faculty | 8 |
Higher Education | 7 |
Evaluation Methods | 5 |
Scholarship | 5 |
Evaluation Criteria | 4 |
Models | 3 |
Organizational Change | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Metropolitan Universities | 3 |
Academe | 1 |
College Composition and… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Higher Education… | 1 |
National Council of Teachers… | 1 |
Nursing Outlook | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 7 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Canada | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Tennessee (Memphis) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sdvizhkov, Helen; Van Zanen, Kathryn; Aravamudan, Neeraja; Aurbach, Elyse L. – Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 2022
Scholarship addressing public and community engagement in tenure and promotion often invokes Ernest Boyer's landmark 1990 report, "Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate," and goes on to lament the lack of progress made in the three decades that have followed. This review intervenes: We synthesize extant scholarship on…
Descriptors: Tenure, Higher Education, Community Involvement, Reports
Lambert-Pennington, Katherine – Metropolitan Universities, 2016
This article explores what an uneven embrace of community engagement means for faculty as they apply for tenure and promotion. It closely examines how three faculty members (including the author) from different departments framed and discussed their engaged scholarly contributions in the presence or absence of departmental guidelines on engaged…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Promotion, Tenure, Faculty Evaluation
National Council of Teachers of English, 2015
Digital media and work with technology has become a critical, integral part of teaching, scholarship, and service in the academy, transforming the ways faculty engage with students, conduct research, and serve their campus, local, and national communities. These guidelines--originally written in 1998 and updated in 2015--are designed to advise…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Guidelines, Higher Education
Chitpin, Stephanie – International Journal of Educational Management, 2015
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to utilize the Objective Knowledge Growth Framework (OKGF) to promote a better understanding of the evaluating tenure and promotion processes. Design/Methodology/Approach: A scenario is created to illustrate the concept of using OKGF. Findings: The framework aims to support decision makers in identifying the…
Descriptors: Tenure, Decision Making, Dismissal (Personnel), Guidelines
Dew, Debra Frank – College Composition and Communication, 2009
This article defines applied rhetorical work as integral to the intellectual work of writing program administration and asks our professional organizations to classify it as such within our position statements. With a specific case, it offers a generative framework for representing and assessing the work's scholarly commons for professional…
Descriptors: Program Administration, Administrator Role, Writing (Composition), Intellectual Disciplines
Gelmon, Sherril B.; Lederer, Miriam; Seifer, Sarena D.; Wong, Kristine – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The findings of the evaluation of the three-year Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative are presented, describing changes in institutional capacity for community-engaged scholarship, and changes in promotion and tenure policies and processes. The change process in the participating institutions is assessed using the Kotter model of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, College Faculty, Teacher Role, Educational Principles
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides

Freeman, Linda H.; Voignier, Ruth R. – Nursing Outlook, 1985
Describes two methods of evaluating nursing education faculty for tenure. Three-page guidelines help document progress toward promotion and tenure. Each page covers one area (teaching, scholarship, service). The second tool is a worksheet upon which faculty can record accomplishments, dates, and documentation. (CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Guidelines

Academe, 1997
The report, prepared by the American Association of University Professors' Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, outlines new proposed policy on posttenure review of faculty. It presents arguments for and against the practice, discusses its use for dismissal purposes, offers guidelines for establishment of a system for periodic evaluation of…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines
El Paso Community Coll., TX. – 1996
This document outlines the procedures for reviewing and recommending faculty tenure at the El Paso County Community College District, in Texas. First, definitions are provided of the participants in the review process, including the tenure candidate, participating administrators, and committees. Next, eligibility for tenure is reviewed, indicating…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty, Community Colleges
Andes, John – 1988
A guide to faculty evaluation is presented for use as the content for an institutional workshop or for use by individual faculty or administrators for their professional development in the area of evaluation. Purposes of evaluation include: providing a basis to recognize superior performance and to offer faculty development activities, providing…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Court Litigation, Employment Practices, Evaluation Methods