NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Howard, Jennifer – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
University presses have complained for years that tenure committees unfairly expect their editors to be arbiters of what counts as tenure-worthy work. At the same time, the presses have been caught in a business-side squeeze between dwindling sales (and shrinking subsidies) and the ever-greater pressure on scholars to publish. In this article, the…
Descriptors: Tenure, University Presses, College Faculty, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, Bert E. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reports on a survey of tenured faculty in the College of Liberal Arts at Auburn University concerning whether or not the number and value of grants ought to be a consideration in the promotion and tenure process. (MS)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Financial Support, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Appleby, David – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Discusses the danger of evaluating faculty by the number and value of grants they receive. (MS)
Descriptors: Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolfgang, Alan P.; And Others – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1995
A survey of 197 pharmacy school faculty members found the faculty evaluation criteria deemed most important in promotion and tenure decisions included refereed publications, extramural funding, the department head's evaluation, and invited scholarly presentations. Respondents expressed a desire to have more importance placed on other aspects of…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Allied Health Occupations Education, College Faculty, Department Heads