Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Academic Freedom | 69 |
Faculty Evaluation | 69 |
Tenure | 69 |
Higher Education | 62 |
College Faculty | 58 |
Personnel Policy | 44 |
Faculty Promotion | 29 |
Fringe Benefits | 29 |
Contracts | 28 |
Grievance Procedures | 25 |
Leaves of Absence | 25 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Practitioners | 19 |
Administrators | 6 |
Teachers | 6 |
Policymakers | 4 |
Location
New York | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Silvernail, Kirk D.; Graso, Maja; Salvador, Rommel O.; Miller, Jane K. – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2021
The present research considers the possibility that guidelines emphasizing academic freedom and faculty self-governance (i.e., those articulated by AAUP and UNESCO) might compete against national norms in shaping faculty fairness perceptions of institutional policies. We investigate the extent to which expectations of academic freedom and faculty…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Governance, Academic Freedom, Teacher Attitudes
Obeng, Kofi; Ugboro, Isaiah O. – Australian Journal of Career Development, 2019
This study investigated the relationships between perceptions of academic tenure, post-tenure review policies, and three dimensions of organisational commitment (affective, continuance, and normative) in university academic staff. We surveyed a sample of 150 academic staff from 74 universities in the USA that have implemented post-tenure review…
Descriptors: Tenure, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Academic Freedom
Johnston, Pattie C.; Schimmel, Tammy; O'Hara, Hunter – College Quarterly, 2012
Legal rulings have called for the inclusion of collegiality as a fourth evaluation category for university faculty. Collegiality is considered to be any extra-role behavior that represents individuals' behavior that is discretionary, not recognized by the formal reward system and that, in the aggregate, promotes the effective functioning of the…
Descriptors: Tenure, Academic Freedom, Faculty Evaluation, Institutional Evaluation
Revisiting the AAUP Recommendation: Initial Validation of a University Faculty Model of Collegiality
Johnston, Pattie C.; Schimmel, Tammy; O'Hara, Hunter – College Quarterly, 2010
University faculty is typically evaluated on their teaching, service and scholarship. Recent literature, faculty comment and legal rulings have called for the inclusion of collegiality as a fourth evaluation category. Collegiality may be thought of as any extra-role behaviour that represents individuals' behaviour that is discretionary, not…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Academic Freedom, Collegiality, College Faculty

Hall, Daniel E. – Educational Forum, 1997
Reviews the history of the tenure system and its constitutional and due process implications. Describes Florida's sustained performance review program, an evaluation of tenured faculty every seven years to encourage continuing professional development. (SK)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Due Process, Faculty Evaluation, Legal Problems

Connell, Mary Ann; Savage, Frederick G. – Journal of College and University Law, 2001
Presents an analysis of the arguments for and against consideration of collegiality in higher education employment decisions and a review of the relevant case law. Critics argue that unless collegiality is specified as a separate criterion for evaluation in the faculty contract or handbook, its use is a breach of contract. Others are concerned…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Collegiality, Cooperation, Evaluation Criteria

Moody, JoAnn – Academe, 2000
Suggests that tenure, rather than discriminating against minorities and women, benefits these groups by protecting their academic freedom in the classroom and by encouraging depth in scholarship, and also by adding to a democratic balance of power between faculty and administrators. Urges a more open tenure review process to eliminate elements of…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion

Hill, John E. – Educational Record, 1985
The faculty of Curry College in 1974 voted unanimously to replace tenure with a type of term contract. Faculty perceptions of the good and bad aspects of the term contract system are presented. Academic freedom, job security, motivation, promotion criteria, and financial benefits are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Change Strategies, College Faculty, Contracts

Hechinger, Fred M. – Change, 1970
The threat of right-wing repression is not so dangerous as the left-wing totalitarian attacks against freedom on the campus. (Editor/IR)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Democratic Values, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

O'Meara, Kerry Ann – Journal of Higher Education, 2004
This article draws upon the literature on academic culture and the academic profession to provide a context for beliefs about post-tenure review. Schein's (1992) theory of organizational culture and Kuh & Whitt's (1988) application of cultural theory to higher education settings divides culture into a conceptual hierarchy comprised of three…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Faculty Evaluation, Academic Freedom, Tenure

Olswang, Steven G.; Fantel, Jane T. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
The separate concepts of tenure and academic freedom and their relation to one form of accountability measure--systematic reviews of the performance of tenured faculty--are examined. It is contended that those reviews can be conducted without infringing upon either academic freedom or the institution of tenure. (LB)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, Administrative Policy, Court Litigation

Scoles, Eugene F. – Journal of Legal Education, 1979
With a focus on law schools and their faculties, this panel discussion addresses the following question: Is tenure a progressive device, preserving academic freedom and encouraging scholarly initiative, or is it a harmful, anachronistic force, protecting entrenched ideas and fostering incompetency? (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Blum, Debra E. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court is requiring the University of Pennsylvania to give faculty peer-review documents to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for its investigation into a sex discrimination case. Academics fear infringement of academic freedom and privacy. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Confidential Records, Court Litigation
Blackman, Harry A. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
The texts of the Supreme Court's syllabus and unanimous opinion in the University of Pennsylvania vs. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is presented. The case involves release of peer-review records in a faculty sex discrimination suit. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Confidential Records, Court Litigation
Association of Coll. and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL. – 1975
The basic documents on faculty status for librarians in colleges and universities are compiled. The first chapter contains a history and overview of university librarians' status and discussions of such topics as professionalism, the librarian's role, tenure, academic freedom, evaluation, titles and ranks, professional growth, research, and…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Academic Rank (Professional), College Libraries, Contracts