Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cues | 2 |
| Sensory Experience | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Broadbent, Hannah J. | 1 |
| Del-Parte, Donna | 1 |
| Kirkham, Natasha Z. | 1 |
| Mareschal, Denis | 1 |
| Osborne, Tamsin | 1 |
| Richardson, R. Thomas | 1 |
| Sammons, Dotty | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBroadbent, Hannah J.; Osborne, Tamsin; Mareschal, Denis; Kirkham, Natasha Z. – Developmental Science, 2019
Multisensory tools are commonly employed within educational settings (e.g. Carter & Stephenson, 2012), and there is a growing body of literature advocating the benefits of presenting children with multisensory information over unisensory cues for learning (Baker & Jordan, 2015; Jordan & Baker, 2011). This is even the case when the…
Descriptors: Multisensory Learning, Teaching Methods, Cues, Retention (Psychology)
Richardson, R. Thomas; Sammons, Dotty; Del-Parte, Donna – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2018
This study compared learning performance during and following AR and non-AR topographic map instruction and practice Two-way ANOVA testing indicated no significant differences on a posttest assessment between map type and spatial ability. Prior learning activity results revealed a significant performance difference between AR and non-AR treatment…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Simulated Environment
