Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 6 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 21 |
| Administrators | 13 |
| Teachers | 6 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| California | 4 |
| Canada | 2 |
| Florida | 2 |
| Pennsylvania | 2 |
| Alabama | 1 |
| Asia | 1 |
| Cambodia | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Iowa | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flanders System of… | 1 |
| Teacher Performance… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCohen, Arthur M.; Brawer, Florence B. – 1971
This topical paper discusses the concept of teacher-student interaction. In an attempt to apply the concept to junior colleges, the paper presents the findings of several research studies in which the types and extent of interaction have been assessed at other levels of schooling. Only a few of the ways in which teachers and students relate are…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Faculty Evaluation, Student Reaction, Student Teacher Relationship
Popham, W. James – 1971
The analysis is intended to provide California educators with a number of specific, step-by-step suggestions for devising the teacher appraisal systems required by new legislation in the Stull Bill. An overview of essential ingredients of the new requirements is given in the first part of this document in order to familiarize teachers with…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Systems Analysis
Rasmuson, N. Arthur – 1972
In reaction to the passage of the Rodda Bill (SB 696, 1971 legislative session), this study concentrates on the instruments and procedures proposed for use in evaluating faculty at Glendale College (California). The two proposals analyzed are administrative viewpoint and faculty opinion. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to measure the…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedFeldhusen, John F. – College Student Journal, 1976
Course and instructor evaluations are being used with increasing regularity in a variety of courses and disciplines. While this is encouraging for those interested in improving instruction, it has created confusion concerning interpretation and use of evaluation data. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedPasnak, Robert – Teaching of Psychology, 1986
Critiques a 1982 research report which related college students' emotions, course grades, and faculty teaching evaluations. Maintains that the design contained several limitations which impugn the validity of the conclusions drawn. (JDH)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Grading
Peer reviewedArreola, Raoul A. – College Student Journal, 1973
Determines that the factor structure of the instructional model measured by the Michigan State University Student Instructional Rating System (SIRS) form could be replicated by an adapted version of the SIRS instrument at Florida State University. (Author)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedHannon, Ralph H.; Kralik, Dan J. – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: College Science, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Karman, Thomas A. – Liberal Educ, 1969
An evaluation system which enables administrators to make wise decisions and faculty members to develop their abilities. (Editor/AD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Faculty Evaluation, Leadership Responsibility, Performance Criteria
Armstrong, Paul B. – ADE Bulletin, 1994
Discusses the "ADE Statement of Good Practice: Teaching, Evaluation, and Scholarship" and the related issue of peer evaluation and the deprivatization of the classroom. Outlines the benefits of peer review of teaching. Argues for increased attention to the documentation of teaching. Appends the "Statement." (HB)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, College English, English Departments, English Instruction
Peer reviewedFeezel, Jerry; Welch, S-A – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses what the scholarship of teaching is, what qualities exist in this form of scholarship, what its requirements are, how one accomplishes it, and how the scholarship of teaching can be assessed. (SR)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Gullatt, David E.; Weaver, Sue W. – 1995
Accountability reports, using both qualitative and quantitative measures of higher education effectiveness, are being mandated by many state legislatures. To date, not enough is known about the components, measurement, and uses of summary data concerning faculty productivity at the higher education level. There are no universally accepted…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Educational Assessment, Faculty Evaluation
Ramos-Cancel, Maria L.; Duttweiler, Patricia Cloud, Ed. – 1986
The papers in this collection are based on the document "Perspectives on Performance-Based Incentive Plans" and offer brief overviews of the following issues in education: (1) performance-based evaluation in relation to incentive pay plans; (2) recommendations for success of performance-based evaluation systems; (3) the use of classroom…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classroom Observation Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Faculty Evaluation
Fox, Charles D.; Tubb, Gary W. – 1979
Before teacher evaluation forms can have any significance for educational research their validity and reliability must be established. This study concerns itself with defining the suitability of the criteria-establishing items that may be contained on teacher evaluations. The areas of inquiry are: the rater (evaluator) difficulty level of each…
Descriptors: Accountability, Efficiency, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Highland Community Coll., Freeport, IL. – 1970
Highland Community College (Illinois) is currently developing procedures for the formal evaluation of its instruction, and will use this study on current practices and problems as a foundation. A review of recent research on the purposes of evaluation indicates that the most widely acceptable is the improvement of instruction. Appropriate criteria…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Investigations
Gilley, J. Wade – 1972
This report deals with evaluating and motivating community college personnel. Following a discussion of the need for evaluation, a number of evaluation theories and practices are presented: rating systems, predictors of effectiveness, student evaluation, direct measurement, and merit salary increases. The author then describes a theory of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Institutional Role, Merit Rating
