Descriptor
| Faculty Evaluation | 3 |
| Guidelines | 3 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Administrator Guides | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Disclosure | 1 |
| Educational Malpractice | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Faculty Promotion | 1 |
| Fear | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Freeman, Linda H. | 1 |
| Miller, Teresa N. | 1 |
| Schulman, Benson R. | 1 |
| Shoop, Robert J. | 1 |
| Trudell, James W. | 1 |
| Voignier, Ruth R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Collected Works - Serial | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSchulman, Benson R.; Trudell, James W. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines
Peer reviewedFreeman, Linda H.; Voignier, Ruth R. – Nursing Outlook, 1985
Describes two methods of evaluating nursing education faculty for tenure. Three-page guidelines help document progress toward promotion and tenure. Each page covers one area (teaching, scholarship, service). The second tool is a worksheet upon which faculty can record accomplishments, dates, and documentation. (CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Guidelines
Direct linkMiller, Teresa N.; Shoop, Robert J. – National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), 2004
Gloria, a first-year principal at Sunflower High School, sighed as she stared at her computer screen. She had been asked to write letters of reference for three teachers who were leaving her school. The first resigned among rumors of misconduct with a student--but before an investigation began. The second was asked to resign after a school…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Fear, Principals, Teacher Evaluation
