NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 61 to 75 of 426 results Save | Export
Grossman, Jack H. – Performance and Instruction, 1991
Discussion of criteria for hiring and the development of university teachers focuses on the development of an instrument for students to evaluate teachers' effectiveness. A copy of the instructor evaluation form developed at DePaul University (Chicago) is included, and suggestions for a program to improve teaching are offered. (LRW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fenwick, Tara J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Discusses the often difficult process of evaluating teaching effectiveness in terms of student learning outcomes. Suggests approaches for micro- and macro-level teacher evaluation using student outcomes. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Custer, Rodney L.; Foster, Terry; Martin, Elizabeth – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1999
Chairs of 175 industrial and technology education programs indicated that 84.8% have a system of posttenure faculty review; nearly 30% said that over 10% of tenured faculty were performing below standard. A majority felt that posttenure review was marginally or not effective. The continuum of review procedures ranged from authoritarian to…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Industrial Education, Teacher Effectiveness
Werdell, Philip R. – 1967
This comprehensive analysis of course and teacher evaluation deals with the following topics: (1) a capsule history of course and teacher evaluation - where the ideas began and what trends have been established; (2) the right and worth of students' evaluation of courses and teachers, including how it relates to faculty academic freedom; and the…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ballard, Michael; And Others – Teaching of Psychology, 1976
A comparison between student and peer ratings of faculty is reviewed. Teaching effectiveness is seen as a combination of amount learned by students, student opinion, and faculty opinion. (DE)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Psychology, Student Attitudes
Gies, Frederick John; Leonard, B. Charles – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Administrator Role, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Needham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Describes a theoretical model for evaluating college faculty that can improve faculty performance and resource allocation. Characteristics of the model, appropriate evaluation criteria for teaching, research, administrative, and other activities, and departmental procedures for determining evaluation criteria and weights are discussed. (AM)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Economics Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Madsen, John – Educational Leadership, 1980
Faculty members of small universities should be judged by their teaching ability, not by their publications. (Author)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martsolf, Donna S.; Dieckman, Barbara Cline; Cartechine, Kathryn A.; Starr, Patricia J.; Wolf, Linda E.; Anaya, Ella R. – Journal of Nursing Education, 1999
Kent State University nursing faculty established a peer-review process through a task-force approach. Classroom and clinical observations and teaching circles were the most effective methods. Program success was attributed to its voluntary nature, its reflection of organizational culture, and administrative support. (SK)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Geisert, Paul – 1973
A model for evaluating the professional activities of elementary school teachers is presented. It is based on: (1) a systematic process for reporting their activities; (2) discrepancy evaluation--the comparison of goals and objectives with outcomes; and (3) product rather than process evaluation. Teacher activity in nine categories is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Elementary School Teachers, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Geisert, Paul – 1973
A model for evaluating the professional activities of high school teachers is presented. It is based on: (1) a systematic process for reporting their activities; (2) discrepancy evaluation--the comparison of goals and objectives with outcomes; and (3) product rather than process evaluation. Teacher activity in nine categories is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Guides
Cook, J. Marvin; Neville, Richard F. – 1971
This paper examines the problem of measuring and evaluation teacher performance. Evaluation methods currently in use are reviewed, including the use of student questionnaires, and a recommendation for a more accurate measurement of teacher effectiveness is made. The authors specifically consider the relative merits of measurement based on student…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Aigner, Dennis J.; Thum, Frederick D. – Economic Education, 1986
Reports the results of a study which examined the relationship of both student and course characteristics to student rankings of instructors. The 1984 data (n=1,333) showed that 67% of the variation in students' evaluations was explained by instructor-specific variables. Presents detailed regression analysis tables and includes copies of the…
Descriptors: Economics Education, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bennett, John B.; Chater, Shirley S. – Educational Record, 1984
Systematic post-tenure evaluation, uniformly and universally applied, preserves the strengths of tenure while allaying public suspicions about tenure and concerns about faculty vigor and accountability. Failure to address increasing public concerns will otherwise increase the likelihood of external regulation. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gregg, Russell T.; Sims, Paul D. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1972
Provides results from a survey, designed to assess the quality of graduate faculties and programs in the field, of faculty members in departments of educational administration. Data concerning the relative quality of graduate departments of educational administration in the United States are presented. (Author/JH)
Descriptors: Departments, Educational Administration, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  29