NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 211 to 225 of 426 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ellig, Nicholas R. – Teaching Sociology, 1986
This article addresses some of the contextual factors that influence faculty evaluation in a small, church-related liberal arts college and identifies five areas in which structural and normative constraints of the institution may affect individual faculty ratings. Provides recommendations for preparing evaluations which minimize the impact of…
Descriptors: Church Related Colleges, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Salomone, Ronald E.; Vorhies, Arthur L. – Educational Record, 1985
Ohio University-Chillicothe devised a faculty-administered salary review process that assigns points for a variety of activities in one primary area (teaching) and two secondary areas (scholarly activity and university/community service) and builds in points for promotion. The system has been well received by faculty and administration for five…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Creativity, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yunker, James A.; Marlin, James W., Jr. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1984
Applies the economic model of utility maximization to two areas of faculty performance evaluation: (1) relationship between teaching effectiveness and research productivity and (2) validity of student evaluations of teachers. (Author/JW)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helmstadter, G. C.; Krus, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
The Berkeley student evaluation questionnaire by Hildebrand, Wilson, and Dienst was modified to reflect the Whitely-Doyle factorial structure of implicit theories students hold about teaching characteristics of their instructors. Student ratings appear to be valid indicators of teaching competency, admissable as evidence to be used for faculty…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Cohen, Peter A.; McKeachie, Wilbert J. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1980
The role of faculty colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching is not defined adequately. A distinction needs to be made between summative evaluation conducted for administrative decisions such as pay increases, promotion, and tenure, and formative evaluations designed to improve teaching. (MLW)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cohen, Peter A. – Research in Higher Education, 1980
A meta-analytic methodology is applied to integrate findings from 22 comparisons of the effectiveness of student- rating feedback at the college level. Feedback had a modest but significant effect on improving instruction. The effects of student-rating feedback were accentuated when augmentation or consultation accompanied the ratings. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Data Analysis, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cavanagh, Ronald R. – Innovative Higher Education, 1996
If faculty peer review of teaching is to overcome institutional marginalization, its formative and summative components must use rules, criteria, and standards for effective teaching that are agreed upon by faculty in the academic unit. This conversation clarifies expectations for curriculum, teaching, and student learning. Only such a process can…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Cooperation, Departments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koon, Jeff; Murray, Harry G. – Journal of Higher Education, 1995
A study of the validity of student ratings of college faculty focused on the relationship of student outcomes to faculty ratings. Subjects were students of 36 full-time instructors; outcome measures included subject matter knowledge, student self-ratings, and measures of short- and long-term motivation (interest in the subject matter). Results…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Outcomes Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marsh, Herbert W. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
Empirical support was derived for the multidimensionality of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness on the Students' Evaluations of Educational Quality (SEEQ) through investigation of the factor structure of the SEEQ from 2 samples of 500 classes. Applications of confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical factor analysis are…
Descriptors: College Students, Factor Structure, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Patrick, Jeff; Smart, Roslyn M. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998
In a two-phase study, 148 undergraduate students identified qualities of effective teachers. These and items from existing measures of teaching effectiveness were combined, and this meta-inventory was administered to 266 psychology students. Results revealed teacher effectiveness is multidimensional in nature, comprising three factors: respect for…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lucal, Betsy; Albers, Cheryl; Ballantine, Jeanne; Burmeister-May, Jodi; Chin, Jeffrey; Dettmer, Sharon; Larson, Sharon – Teaching Sociology, 2003
Addresses the relationship between the scholarship of teaching and learning (STL) and faculty assessment. Derives two conclusions: (1) significant opportunities exist for sociologists to contribute to STL within faculty assessment ; and (2) conceptual and empirical STL can be conducted within a sociological framework to improve assessment methods…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Martin, Robert E. – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 2006
Given the public's demand for better teaching (and its indifference to scholarship), one might think there would be a vigorous demand for high quality instructors at all levels of higher education. Instead, the healthiest market remains that for scholars. In this article, the author discusses the differences in the markets for scholars and…
Descriptors: Demand Occupations, Labor Market, College Faculty, College Instruction
Fayne, Harriet R. – 1991
This paper addresses faculty evaluation and the use of performance-based assessment documents (teaching dossiers or portfolios) to promote and maintain a high level of teaching quality at the higher education level. It is suggested that an evaluation tool, such as the dossier, should emphasize teaching effectiveness and allow educational…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Veir, Carole – 1991
The Developmental Teacher Evaluation Kit (DeTek) and the Texas Teacher Appraisal System (TTAS) are compared in this report. The DeTek model is based on objective analysis, diagnostic procedures to guide inservice planning and professional growth, an ongoing cycle of evaluation and development, and provision of diagnostic instruments. It is limited…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Research, Faculty Development
Perry, Raymond P. – 1981
Issues pertaining to the validity of student ratings of teacher effectiveness, research on "educational seduction," and implications of the research for the evaluation and improvement of teaching are reviewed. Criteria that have been used to validate student ratings include student achievement, faculty ratings, self-ratings, research productivity,…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  ...  |  29