NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)3
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Source
NASSP Bulletin27
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Race to the Top1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Derrington, Mary Lynne; Martinez, James Anthony – NASSP Bulletin, 2019
Teacher perceptions after 5 years of implementing evaluation protocols that were initiated under Race to the Top revealed attitudes about the evaluation instrument used and the nature of their relationship with the evaluator. This study surveyed middle and high school teachers in nine Eastern Tennessee school districts. Data indicated unintended…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Evaluation Methods, Tests, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hopkins, Paul – NASSP Bulletin, 2016
The purpose of this study was to determine how K-12 public school teachers perceive the use of student performance data in teacher evaluations. The proprietary, utility, feasibility, and accuracy standards created by the Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation served as a framework for the study. An online survey was deployed to a…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Faculty Development, Public School Teachers, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knight, Megan; Cooper, Robyn – NASSP Bulletin, 2019
This study explored high school teachers' perceptions of the effects of standards-based grading (SBG) on planning, instruction, assessment, classroom management, and student behaviors. Findings indicated that despite some infidelity and an initial implementation dip, systemic (SBG) changes made teaching clearer, more purposeful, and more conducive…
Descriptors: High School Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, Grading, Academic Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Khachatryan, Edit – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Teachers crave yet rarely receive qualitative performance feedback. Though student feedback has been studied, we know little about what kinds of feedback are useful to teachers for improving practice. This study begins to address the need in research on the nature of feedback teachers receive from classroom observations as well as on how teachers…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Observation, Teaching Methods, Administrator Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Owings, William A.; Kaplan, Leslie S.; Khrabrova, Iryna; Chappell, Shanan – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Prior research on Troops to Teachers (TTT) affirms that TTTs are effective instructors likely to work in high-poverty, high-minority schools, teach high-demand subjects, use research-based instructional and classroom management practices linked with student achievement, and plan to stay in the profession. A nonexperimental, mixed method design…
Descriptors: Teacher Surveys, Administrator Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Licata, Joseph W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Performance legitimacy exists when leadership traits valued by subordinates are observed in leaders. This article discusses six facets of leadership that can be measured to determine this legitimacy and tells how a performance legitimacy profile can test the congruence between teachers' and an administrator's evaluations of the administrator's…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eastridge, Harry E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Can evaluation of teachers by students be effective? The author, who reviewed much of the research on the subject, describes the findings, points out similarities and differences, and concludes that student evaluations may serve as a valuable adjunct to improving instruction. (Editor)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Evaluation Criteria, Feedback, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sapone, Carmelo V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
The research reported indicates a wide difference in how administrators and teachers rank the importance of each component of an evaluation system. Even though it may be desirable to have an effective appraisal and evaluation system, the data suggest that, realistically, this system may be impossible to implement. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heyman, Rosalyn S. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Results and conclusions of an attempt in Los Angeles to bring PPBS to the teachers. (Editor)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Objectives, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buser, Robert L.; Banks, Freddie A., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Superintendents, principals, and teachers were surveyed to determine attitudes about principal evaluation. Findings include agreement that superintendents should be evaluators, that assistance in professional growth is the purpose, and overall agreement that evaluation of educational leaders should be done by educators. (MD)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pine, Gerald J.; Boy, Angelo V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
These authors see teacher evaluation as a cooperative process, one that evaluates competency from both internal and external frames of reference. Meeting initial resistance, determining who evaluates, and outlining necessary conditions are all part of this article. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Student Development, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McIntyre, Kenneth E.; Grant, Ed A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
Some differences in priorities and rankings emerged when principals, superintendents, and teachers ranked the importance of eight principal competencies and evaluated 18 principals on their performance. (JM)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Responsibility, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, Stephen J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Proposes guidelines for principals attempting to evaluate teachers' grading policies. Principals should understand teachers' perspectives, ask for copies of their grading policies, be wary of traits (like "effort") not measuring achievement, consider grading information quality, think about homework's role, expect teachers to use numbers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Responsibility, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimmerman, Sherri; Deckert-Pelton, Melanie – NASSP Bulletin, 2003
Surveys 86 teachers from five Florida counties to determine their perceptions of their principals' effectiveness as evaluators. Finds four areas teachers consider essential for effective teacher evaluation: Principal initiated interaction with teachers, consistent evaluation process, principal commitment to effective evaluations, and principal…
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johns, Frank; Tyrrell, Ronald – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
This article tells the story of how a university can develop an on-site inservice program for teachers that deals with day-to-day, real-life issues of teaching. Such a program benefits both the university and school participants. (Editor)
Descriptors: Inservice Education, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2