Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Response Rates… | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Electronic Mail | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Internet | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Research Review | 1 |
Author
| Fan, Xitao | 2 |
| Shih, Tse-Hua | 1 |
| Wang, Lin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShih, Tse-Hua; Fan, Xitao – Educational Research Review, 2009
This meta-analysis examined 35 study results within last 10 years that directly compared the response rates of e-mail versus mail surveys. Individual studies reported inconsistent findings concerning the response rate difference between e-mail and mail surveys, but e-mail surveys generally have lower response rate (about 20% lower on the average)…
Descriptors: Mail Surveys, Response Rates (Questionnaires), Comparative Analysis, Meta Analysis
Download full textWang, Lin; Fan, Xitao – 1998
The popularity of the sample survey in educational research makes it necessary for consumers to tell a good study from a poor one. Several sources were identified that gave advice on how to evaluate a sample design. The sources are either limited or too extensive to use in a practical sense. The purpose of this paper is to recommend six important…
Descriptors: Criteria, Data Collection, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
