Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Supervisors | 3 |
Supervisory Methods | 3 |
Doctoral Programs | 2 |
Graduate Students | 2 |
Supervisor Supervisee… | 2 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
Anesthesiology | 1 |
Anxiety | 1 |
Cultural Differences | 1 |
Cultural Pluralism | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Angel Chan | 1 |
Bearman, Margaret | 1 |
Carter, Susan | 1 |
Castanelli, Damian J. | 1 |
Jenny Ritchie | 1 |
Kumar, Vijay | 1 |
Molloy, Elizabeth | 1 |
Weller, Jennifer M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
New Zealand | 3 |
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Angel Chan; Jenny Ritchie – International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 2024
This paper performs a critical qualitative inquiry exploring supervision pedagogies utilising duoethnography as both methodology and conceptual framing. We begin the inquiry by reflecting upon our social and cultural identities and our evolving supervisor/supervisee-colleague-friend relationship. Our critical dialogue then shifts to scrutinising…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Supervisors, Supervisory Methods, Supervisor Supervisee Relationship
Castanelli, Damian J.; Weller, Jennifer M.; Molloy, Elizabeth; Bearman, Margaret – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2020
Medical educators are tasked with decisions on trainee progression and credentialing for independent clinical practice, which requires robust evidence from workplace-based assessment. It is unclear how the current promotion of workplace-based assessment as a pedagogical approach to promote learning has impacted this use of assessments for…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Medical Education, Supervisors, Supervisory Methods
Carter, Susan; Kumar, Vijay – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2017
Doctoral supervisors aim for two goals. One is a strong thesis, timely in submission. The other is the fully fledged independent researcher who is able to write about research clearly within an epistemologically accepted framework. Feedback and feedforward on writing should address both goals. However, in many institutions, supervisors are under…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Graduate Students, Doctoral Programs, Supervisory Methods