Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Grading | 9 |
Group Activities | 9 |
Student Projects | 9 |
Peer Evaluation | 6 |
Evaluation Methods | 4 |
Assignments | 3 |
Student Evaluation | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Educational Benefits | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 3 |
Balance Sheet | 1 |
IEEE Transactions on Learning… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Chemical Education | 1 |
Journal of Marketing Education | 1 |
PRIMUS | 1 |
Author
Cline, Kelly S. | 1 |
Currano, Judith N. | 1 |
Dommeyer, Curt J. | 1 |
Fullerton, Hazel | 1 |
Gross, Thilo | 1 |
Guzmán, Sebastián G. | 1 |
Hanson, Robert N. | 1 |
Harvey, Hugh | 1 |
Jovanovic, Jelena M. | 1 |
Keen, James | 1 |
Kijevcanin, Anisja | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tomic, Bojan; Kijevcanin, Anisja; Sevarac, Zoran; Jovanovic, Jelena M. – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023
Soft skills (such as communication and collaboration) are rarely addressed in programming courses, mostly because they are difficult to teach, assess, and grade. A quantitative, modular, AI-based approach for assessing and grading students' collaboration has been examined in this article. The pedagogical underpinning of the approach includes a…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Grading, Cooperation, Students
Harvey, Hugh; Keen, James; Robinson, Chester; Roff, James; Gross, Thilo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Group work, where students work on projects to overcome challenges together, has numerous advantages, including learning of important transferable skills, better learning experience and increased motivation. However, in many academic systems the advantages of group projects clash with the need to assign individualised marks to students. A number…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Grading, Cooperative Learning, Student Projects
Guzmán, Sebastián G. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Group projects are widely used in higher education, but they can be problematic if all group members are given the same grade for a project to which they might not have contributed equally. Most scholars recommend addressing these problems by awarding individual grades, computing some kind of individual weighting factor (IWF) from peer and…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Group Activities
Currano, Judith N. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2016
The University of Pennsylvania's doctoral chemistry curriculum has included a required course in chemical information since 1995. Twenty years later, the course has evolved from a loosely associated series of workshops on information resources to a holistic examination of the chemical literature and its place in the general research process. The…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, College Science, Chemistry, Doctoral Programs
Dommeyer, Curt J. – Journal of Marketing Education, 2012
Professors often give members of a group project the same grade or they use peer evaluations to provide individualized grades. Unfortunately, both these methods have shortcomings. This article describes the segment manager method (SMM), a method for assigning individualized grades on the group project that does not rely on peer evaluations. A…
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, Marketing, College Students, Student Projects
Willmot, Peter; Pond, Keith – International Journal of Higher Education, 2012
Self and peer assessment offers benefits for enhancing student learning. Peer moderation provides a convenient solution for awarding individual marks in group assignments. This paper provides a significant review of peer-mark moderation, and describes an award winning, web-based tool that was developed in the UK and is now spreading across the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Self Evaluation (Groups), Peer Evaluation, Group Activities
Cline, Kelly S. – PRIMUS, 2008
We discuss an upper division applied statistics course that has been structured to satisfy our college's writing intensive requirements within the mathematics major. In this course, students complete two projects, performing both a statistical survey and a controlled experiment, and then write up their work on each project in a formal paper. After…
Descriptors: Statistical Surveys, Statistics, Writing Skills, Writing Across the Curriculum
Panian, Robert C.; Hanson, Robert N. – Balance Sheet, 1973
Descriptors: Business Education, Grading, Group Activities, Student Evaluation

Rafiq, Yaqub; Fullerton, Hazel – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1996
One university's use of peer evaluation to develop fair and reliable distribution of grades for group projects is described, and its adaptation to the specific requirements of civil engineering is examined. Results suggest the evaluation model is transferable to this discipline. In particular, use of student journals for grade allocation was found…
Descriptors: Civil Engineering, Engineering Education, Evaluation Methods, Grading