NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Social Security1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 66 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Som Nath Ghimire; Upaj Bhattarai; Raj K. Baral – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
The problem of academic dishonesty in general and exam cheating in particular, has been ubiquitous in schools, colleges, and universities around the world. This paper reports on the findings from teachers' and students' experiences and perceptions of exam cheating at Nepali schools, colleges, and universities. In so doing, the paper highlights the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Foreign Countries, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Müge Uluman Mert; Emine Burcu Tunç – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2023
The aim of this research study was to analyse the relationship among answer-copying tendency, academic self-efficacy, and fear of negative evaluation. To this end, we formed a structural equivalence model, and we evaluated the mediating role of academic self-efficacy between answer-copying tendency and fear of negative evaluation. A total of 562…
Descriptors: Self Efficacy, Cheating, Student Behavior, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colette Melissa Kell; Yasmeen Thandar; Adelle Kemlall Bhundoo; Firoza Haffejee; Bongiwe Mbhele; Jennifer Ducray – Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2025
Purpose: Academic integrity is vital to the success and sustainability of the academic project and particularly critical in the training of ethical and informed health professionals. Yet studies have found that cheating in online exams was commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the increased use of online and blended learning…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Integrity, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Agwu, Prince; Odii, Aloysius; Orjiakor, Tochukwu; Roy, Pallavi; Nzeadibe, Chidi; Onalu, Chinyere; Okoye, Uzoma Odera; Onwujekwe, Obinna – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2022
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the nature and operations of schools commonly regarded as "Miracle Examination Centres (MECs)" in Nigeria, through the lens of stakeholders in education. This study also assessed stakeholders' perspectives on the possible solutions to the problem of MECs. Design/methodology/approach: The…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Malpractice, Cheating, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jasper Roe; Mike Perkins; Gi Kunchana Chonu; Abhishek Bhati – Higher Education Research and Development, 2024
In this article we report on a study of higher education students' (N = 256) perceptions on the willingness, pressure, and frequency of their peers to cheat in online assessments at an Australian university in Singapore during the COVID-19 induced Online Teaching and Assessment period (COTA). MANOVA was used to identify the differences in…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Cheating, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Abood, Harith; Abu Maizer, Maha – International Journal of Technology in Education, 2022
This is a descriptive study to investigate one of the most critical issues faced by teachers in evaluating their students' performance at the university level during COVID-19. It aimed to specify the exams' problems faced by the Jordanian universities' teaching staff members, and the strategies they used to face cheating by their students in…
Descriptors: Cheating, Methods, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Esteban Guevara Hidalgo – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2025
The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on education, forcing many teachers and students who were not used to online education to adapt to an unanticipated reality by improvising new teaching and learning methods. Within the realm of virtual education, the evaluation methods underwent a transformation, with some assessments shifting towards…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza – Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2022
This study aimed at highlighting the Turkish higher education learners' perceptions of cheating on online learning programs, the ways of, causes for, and some suggestions to minimize cheating. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from 163 online learners via a questionnaire including both open-ended and close-ended questions. Data…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Online Courses, Cheating, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reza Taherkhani; Saba Aref – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
The current study aimed to explore effective strategies for preventing cheating in online examinations by surveying students to determine their cheating strategies. A total of 406 Iranian students at BA, MA, and PhD levels in four programs, including English language teaching, English literature, Linguistics, and English language translation,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Strategies, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Phillip Dawson; Helen Partridge – Higher Education Research and Development, 2024
Remote proctoring of exams is one of the most divisive issues in higher education. Critiques of remote proctoring abound, and there are a variety of perspectives particularly in relation to the advantages and disadvantages of this type of assessment, and opportunities for cheating. However, these perspectives are largely based on rhetoric with…
Descriptors: Supervision, Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harper, Rowena; Bretag, Tracey; Rundle, Kiata – Higher Education Research and Development, 2021
This article contributes to an emerging body of research on the role of assessment design in the prevention and detection of contract cheating. Drawing on the largest contract cheating dataset gathered to date (see cheatingandassessment.edu.au), this article examines the types of assignments and exams in which students self-reported having engaged…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bozdag, Berkan – Participatory Educational Research, 2021
The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between university students' fear of negative evaluation and their academic dishonesty tendencies and to compare them in terms of various variables. The sample of the study carried out in the relational screening model consists of 306 students, who were selected by the easily accessible sampling…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Cheating, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hossein Navidinia; Adrian Naznean; Maha Sourani; Nargess Hekmati – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2024
Online teaching has gained more momentum since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this mode offers many benefits, one major concern is maintaining academic integrity, as online instruction can provide more opportunities for cheating. This study aimed to explore students' attitudes toward cheating in online assessments (OAs) and any…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Prince Agwu; Charles T. Orjiakor; Aloysius Odii; Chinyere Onalu; Chidi Nzeadibe; Pallavi Roy; Obinna Onwujekwe; Uzoma Okoye – Oxford Review of Education, 2024
The importance placed on passing Senior Secondary School Certificate Examinations (SSCE) in Nigeria has led to the emergence of 'Miracle Examination Centres' (MECs). MECs are schools where candidates get undeserving excellent SSCE results through institutionally enabled malpractice. This undermines the Nigerian education sector and its leadership.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Exit Examinations, Ethics, Certification
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5