Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Accountability | 8 |
Cheating | 8 |
Student Behavior | 8 |
Ethics | 4 |
High Stakes Tests | 4 |
Federal Legislation | 3 |
Plagiarism | 3 |
Public Schools | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Teacher Behavior | 3 |
Testing | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Education Policy Research Unit | 2 |
Business Communication… | 1 |
Education Digest: Essential… | 1 |
Education Week | 1 |
Educational Policy | 1 |
National Bureau of Economic… | 1 |
Phi Delta Kappan | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 4 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dench, Daniel L.; Joyce, Theodore J. – National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022
The rapid increase in online instruction in higher education has heightened concerns about cheating. We use a randomized control design to test whether informing students that we can detect plagiarism reduces cheating. We further test whether informing students they have been caught cheating reduces subsequent cheating. We find informing students…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Undergraduate Students, Plagiarism, Cheating
Kavanagh, Kara M.; Fisher-Ari, Teresa R. – Educational Policy, 2020
Nested within a 5-year examination of Teach for America (TFA) corps members' experiences with learning to teach, this article focuses on the salient theme of "Reform Models" found in data collected when a highly publicized testing cheating scandal was breaking in this urban district. Using constructivist grounded theory, researchers…
Descriptors: Accountability, Public Policy, Educational Policy, Educational Change
Samuels, Christina A. – Education Week, 2011
The cheating scandal that has rocked the 48,000-student Atlanta school system was an egregious, but not entirely unexpected, byproduct of accountability pressures, many testing experts say. The reason: As long as test scores are used in any field to make decisions on rewards or punishments, including for schools or educators, a small percentage of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Testing, High Stakes Tests, Accountability
Mechenbier, Mahli Xuan – Business Communication Quarterly, 2011
Business professionals often use standard templates when composing documents, and teachers of business writing direct students to textbook examples to use as sample formats. Good instructors do want to provide their students with informative examples of what is expected, especially in an online course environment where students cannot raise their…
Descriptors: Business Communication, Online Courses, College Students, Plagiarism
Strom, Paris S.; Strom, Robert D. – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 2007
There are some speculations why students of all age groups and achievement levels cheat. One line of speculation is that dishonesty in school merely reflects the broader erosion of ethical behavior which has become commonplace in societies that tend to support self-centeredness over concern for others. Another is that concern about high-stakes…
Descriptors: Student Behavior, Antisocial Behavior, Teacher Role, Parent Participation
Starnes, Bobby Ann – Phi Delta Kappan, 2005
In this article, Bobby Ann Starnes, discusses cheating in the classroom and in the political world. She uses specific examples from her own school experiences and from president Bush's "Texas Miracle." She discusses what students consider as real needs for cheating, which include students staying eligible for sports or membership in…
Descriptors: Cheating, Accountability, Ethics, Federal Legislation
The Inevitable Corruption of Indicators and Educators through High-Stakes Testing. Executive Summary
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators