Descriptor
| Labor Market | 2 |
| Labor Relations | 2 |
| Strikes | 2 |
| Unions | 2 |
| Collective Bargaining | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Economic Factors | 1 |
| Employer Employee Relationship | 1 |
| Government Employees | 1 |
| Labor Legislation | 1 |
| Labor Problems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Government Union Review | 1 |
| Phylon | 1 |
Author
| Dickman, Howard | 1 |
| Marks, Carole | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
| Historical Materials | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dickman, Howard – Government Union Review, 1984
Historical evidence is presented for the thesis that exclusive union representation by majority rule was adopted in the private sector primarily to pave the way for a corporative state. Peaceful, orderly collective bargaining by "responsible" unions in a competitive economy was a minor, secondary consideration. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Government Employees, Labor Legislation, Labor Market
Peer reviewedMarks, Carole – Phylon, 1981
This paper modifies Edna Bonacich's theory of class conflict which cites the split labor market during the period of 1920-30 as the cause of racial antagonisms. The author states that Bonacich neglected the role of employers and technological advance in the creation of the split labor market. (ML)
Descriptors: Conflict, Economic Factors, Employer Employee Relationship, Labor Market
