Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Stimuli | 7 |
Foreign Countries | 4 |
College Students | 3 |
Conditioning | 3 |
Operant Conditioning | 3 |
Reinforcement | 3 |
Cues | 2 |
Discrimination Learning | 2 |
Generalization | 2 |
Punishment | 2 |
Responses | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 7 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Daniel Schmidt – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Six experiments were conducted with graduate students to assess resurgence of compound (i.e., multi-step) academic responding under free operant procedures. Participants learned two different interobserver agreement (IOA) methods -- compound behaviors -- through instructional phases before beginning the experimental phases. Each experiment…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Student Behavior, Student Reaction, Responses
Stahl, Christoph; Bading, Karoline Corinna – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
The evaluative conditioning (EC) phenomenon is central to the study of preference acquisition and attitude formation. Early studies have reported EC in the absence of awareness, but more recent work has questioned this conclusion. In previous work, using briefly presented and pattern-masked conditioned stimuli (CSs), we found that above-chance…
Descriptors: Conditioning, Perception, Stimuli, Evaluation
Lee, Jessica C.; Hayes, Brett K.; Lovibond, Peter F. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Two experiments tested whether a peak-shifted generalization gradient could be explained by the averaging of distinct gradients displayed in subgroups reporting different generalization rules. Across experiments using a causal judgment task (Experiment 1) and a fear conditioning paradigm (Experiment 2), we found a close concordance between…
Descriptors: Generalization, Associative Learning, Discrimination Learning, Learning Theories
Sonoda, Akira; Okouchi, Hiroto – Psychological Record, 2012
One member of each pair of 52 undergraduates, referred to as a learner, was trained BC conditional discriminations, with B stimuli as the samples and C stimuli as the correct comparisons. Responses of the learner were either reinforced or punished by another member of each pair, an instructor, who had previously mastered AC conditional…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Privacy, Conditioning, Reinforcement
Fields, Lanny; Watanabe-Rose, Mari – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
By definition, all of the stimuli in an equivalence class have to be functionally interchangeable with each other. The present experiment, however, demonstrated that this was not the case when using post-class-formation dual-option response transfer tests. With college students, two 4-node 6-member equivalence classes with nodal structures of…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Classification, Operant Conditioning, College Students
Perez-Gonzalez, Luis Antonio; Alonso-Alvarez, Benigno – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
We tested whether teaching control by single stimulus samples in conditional discriminations would result in common control of two-stimuli compound samples, and vice versa. In Experiment 1, 5 participants were first taught four single-sample conditional discriminations. The first conditional discrimination was as follows: given sample stimulus P1,…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Operant Conditioning, Discrimination Learning, Undergraduate Students
Whelan, Robert; Barnes-Holmes, Dermot; Dymond, Simon – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Across three experiments, the transformation of consequential functions in accordance with a seven-member relational network (A-B-C-D-E-F-G) was investigated. In this network, the relational rankings ranged from A, ranked the least, to G, ranked the most. In the first phase, contextual cues for more-than and less-than were established by training…
Descriptors: Responses, Stimuli, Cues, Generalization