Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Cheating | 13 |
Scores | 13 |
Statistical Analysis | 13 |
High Stakes Tests | 4 |
Incidence | 4 |
Identification | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Audits (Verification) | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 9 |
Journal Articles | 8 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Nigeria | 1 |
Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
Defining Issues Test | 1 |
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
He, Qingping; Meadows, Michelle; Black, Beth – Research Papers in Education, 2022
A potential negative consequence of high-stakes testing is inappropriate test behaviour involving individuals and/or institutions. Inappropriate test behaviour and test collusion can result in aberrant response patterns and anomalous test scores and invalidate the intended interpretation and use of test results. A variety of statistical techniques…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, High Stakes Tests, Scores, Response Style (Tests)
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), score differencing is one of six types of statistical methods used to detect test fraud. In this paper, we suggested the use of Bayes factors (e.g., Kass & Raftery, 1995) for score differencing. A simulation study shows that the suggested approach performs slightly better than an existing frequentist…
Descriptors: Cheating, Deception, Statistical Analysis, Bayesian Statistics
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), benefitting from item preknowledge is one of the three broad types of test fraud that occur in educational assessments. We use tools from constrained statistical inference to suggest a new statistic that is based on item scores and response times and can be used to detect the examinees who may have…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Items, Reaction Time, Cheating
Feinman, Yalena – ProQuest LLC, 2018
The credibility of unsupervised exams, one of the biggest challenges of e-learning, is currently maintained by proctoring. However, little has been done to determine whether expensive and inconvenient proctoring is necessary. The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine whether the use of security mechanisms, based on the taxonomy of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Introductory Courses, Statistics, Community Colleges
Emenalo, Florence Chizoba – Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2016
Many undergraduate students copy a lot from other people's research project reports and many graduate students lack the capacity to carry out and report the research work required of them for graduation. This research ascertained the views of Science and Arts Education students on the causes of the problem, types, and the strategies the university…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Incidence, Plagiarism, Undergraduate Students
Grühn, Daniel; Cheng, Yanhua – Teaching of Psychology, 2014
Montepare suggested the use of a self-correcting approach to multiple-choice tests: Students first take the exam as usual, but are allowed to hand in a self-corrected version afterwards. The idea of this approach is that the additional interaction with the material may foster further learning. To examine whether such an approach actually improves…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Active Learning, Large Group Instruction
Berardi, Victor – Journal of Effective Teaching, 2011
Much of the recent research on homework focuses on using online, web-based, or computerized homework systems. These systems have many reported capabilities and benefits, including the ability to randomize values, which enables multiple attempts by a student or to reduce academic dishonesty. This study reports on the impact of using randomized…
Descriptors: Scores, Cheating, Student Evaluation, Tests
O'Neill, Heather M.; Pfeiffer, Christian A. – Accounting Education, 2012
Researchers studying academic dishonesty in college often focus on demographic characteristics of cheaters and discuss changes in cheating trends over time. To predict cheating behaviour, some researchers examine the costs and benefits of academic cheating, while others view campus culture and the role which honour codes play in affecting…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Student Behavior, Undergraduate Students
Williams, Leslie K. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Research indicates that approximately 70% of college students engage in some form of cheating (Austin, Simpson, & Reynen, 2005; Bowers, 1964; Leming; 1978; McCabe & Trevino, 1993, 1996; McCabe, Trevino, & Butterfield, 2001a). College students overwhelmingly agree that cheating is morally wrong; yet, their actions are not reflective of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Research Design, Moral Development, Undergraduate Students

Jacob, Brian A.; Levitt, Steven D. – Education Next, 2004
Describes the results of a 3-year investigation into cheating by school personnel in Chicago and the design of a technique that will help to bring the problem under better control. The goals of the research were to measure the prevalence of cheating by teachers and administrators and to analyze the factors that predict cheating. (MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Audits (Verification), Cheating, Elementary Education
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Harvard Education Press, 2007
Drawing on their extensive research, Nichols and Berliner document and categorize the ways that high-stakes testing threatens the purposes and ideals of the American education system. For more than a decade, the debate over high-stakes testing has dominated the field of education. This passionate and provocative book provides a fresh perspective…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Social Influences, Scores, Test Bias

Gohmann, Stephan F.; Spector, Lee C. – Journal of Economic Education, 1989
Compares the effect of content ordering and scrambled ordering on examinations in courses, such as economics, that require quantitative skills. Empirical results suggest that students do no better if they are given a content-ordered rather than a scrambled examination as student performance is not adversely affected by scrambled ordered…
Descriptors: Cheating, Economics Education, Educational Research, Grading
Jacob, Brian A.; Levitt, Steven D. – Education Next, 2004
This article describes the results of a three-year investigation into cheating by school personnel. The goals of this research were to measure the prevalence of cheating by teachers and administrators and to analyze the factors that predict cheating. Using data on test scores and student records from the Chicago Public Schools, the authors…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Student Records, Statistical Analysis, School Personnel