Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Classification | 5 |
Familiarity | 5 |
Statistical Analysis | 5 |
College Students | 3 |
Second Language Learning | 3 |
Computational Linguistics | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
English (Second Language) | 2 |
Language Proficiency | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Stimuli | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Journal of Research in Reading | 1 |
Language Testing | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Author
Crossley, Scott A. | 2 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 2 |
Forster, Jens | 1 |
Gillebaart, Marleen | 1 |
Lee, Jia-Ying | 1 |
Olds, Justin M. | 1 |
Rotteveel, Mark | 1 |
Salsbury, Tom | 1 |
Westerman, Deanne L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olds, Justin M.; Westerman, Deanne L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Stimuli that are processed fluently tend to be regarded as more familiar and are more likely to be classified as old on a recognition test compared with less fluent stimuli. Recently it was shown that the standard relationship between fluency and positive recognition judgments can be reversed if participants are trained that previously studied…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Recall (Psychology), Recognition (Psychology), Feedback (Response)
Gillebaart, Marleen; Forster, Jens; Rotteveel, Mark – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
Combining regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997) and novelty categorization theory (Forster, Marguc, & Gillebaart, 2010), we predicted that novel stimuli would be more positively evaluated when focused on growth as compared with security and that familiar stimuli would be more negatively evaluated when focused on growth as compared with security.…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Priming, Classification, Cues
Crossley, Scott A.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Journal of Research in Reading, 2012
This study addresses research gaps in predicting second language (L2) writing proficiency using linguistic features. Key to this analysis is the inclusion of linguistic measures at the surface, textbase and situation model level that assess text cohesion and linguistic sophistication. The results of this study demonstrate that five variables…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Familiarity, Second Language Learning, Word Frequency
Crossley, Scott A.; Salsbury, Tom; McNamara, Danielle S. – Language Testing, 2012
This study explores how second language (L2) texts written by learners at various proficiency levels can be classified using computational indices that characterize lexical competence. For this study, 100 writing samples taken from 100 L2 learners were analyzed using lexical indices reported by the computational tool Coh-Metrix. The L2 writing…
Descriptors: Semantics, Familiarity, Discriminant Analysis, Vocabulary Development
Lee, Jia-Ying – ProQuest LLC, 2011
The main purpose of this study was to compare the strategies used by Chinese-speaking students when confronted with familiar versus unfamiliar topics in a multiple-choice format reading comprehension test. The focus was on describing what students do when they are taking reading comprehension tests by asking students to verbalize their thoughts.…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Teaching Methods, Statistical Analysis, English (Second Language)