Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 47 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 101 |
Descriptor
Cheating | 113 |
Statistical Analysis | 113 |
Ethics | 49 |
Foreign Countries | 45 |
College Students | 36 |
Student Attitudes | 36 |
Student Behavior | 31 |
Questionnaires | 27 |
Undergraduate Students | 23 |
Gender Differences | 22 |
Plagiarism | 20 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Sinharay, Sandip | 8 |
Johnson, Matthew S. | 4 |
Meijer, Rob R. | 3 |
Sotaridona, Leonardo S. | 3 |
Yormaz, Seha | 3 |
Belov, Dmitry I. | 2 |
Jacob, Brian A. | 2 |
Levitt, Steven D. | 2 |
Liebler, Robert | 2 |
Sunbul, Onder | 2 |
van der Linden, Wim J. | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 113 |
Journal Articles | 102 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 7 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Nigeria | 9 |
Turkey | 6 |
Saudi Arabia | 4 |
United States | 4 |
Australia | 3 |
Canada | 3 |
China | 3 |
Kenya | 3 |
Ethiopia | 2 |
Germany | 2 |
Israel | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Higher Education Act 1965 | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Patterns of Adaptive Learning… | 2 |
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale | 2 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
Brief Symptom Inventory | 1 |
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
Law School Admission Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Use of Theory of Linear Mixed-Effects Models to Detect Fraudulent Erasures at an Aggregate Level
Peng, Luyao; Sinharay, Sandip – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Wollack et al. (2015) suggested the erasure detection index (EDI) for detecting fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) extended the index of Wollack et al. (2015) to suggest three EDIs for detecting fraudulent erasures at the aggregate or group level. This article follows up on the research of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Statistical Analysis, Testing
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
Score differencing is one of the six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Ucar, Arzu; Dogan, Celal Deha – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021
Distance learning has become a popular phenomenon across the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. This led to answer copying behavior among individuals. The cut point of the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KL) method, one of the copy detecting methods, was calculated using the Youden Index, Cost-Benefit, and Min Score p-value approaches. Using the cut…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Cutting Scores, Statistical Analysis
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Score differencing is one of six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2021
Drasgow, Levine, and Zickar (1996) suggested a statistic based on the Neyman-Pearson lemma (e.g., Lehmann & Romano, 2005, p. 60) for detecting preknowledge on a known set of items. The statistic is a special case of the optimal appropriateness indices of Levine and Drasgow (1988) and is the most powerful statistic for detecting item…
Descriptors: Robustness (Statistics), Hypothesis Testing, Statistics, Test Items
Wang, Xi; Liu, Yang; Robin, Frederic; Guo, Hongwen – International Journal of Testing, 2019
In an on-demand testing program, some items are repeatedly used across test administrations. This poses a risk to test security. In this study, we considered a scenario wherein a test was divided into two subsets: one consisting of secure items and the other consisting of possibly compromised items. In a simulation study of multistage adaptive…
Descriptors: Identification, Methods, Test Items, Cheating
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), score differencing is one of six types of statistical methods used to detect test fraud. In this paper, we suggested the use of Bayes factors (e.g., Kass & Raftery, 1995) for score differencing. A simulation study shows that the suggested approach performs slightly better than an existing frequentist…
Descriptors: Cheating, Deception, Statistical Analysis, Bayesian Statistics
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2019
Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is a major type of fraudulent behavior during educational assessments. This paper suggests a new statistic that can be used for detecting the examinees who may have benefitted from item preknowledge using their response times. The statistic quantifies the difference in…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Reaction Time, Identification
Sunbul, Onder; Yormaz, Seha – International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 2018
In this study Type I Error and the power rates of omega (?) and GBT (generalized binomial test) indices were investigated for several nominal alpha levels and for 40 and 80-item test lengths with 10,000-examinee sample size under several test level restrictions. As a result, Type I error rates of both indices were found to be below the acceptable…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Cheating, Duplication, Test Length
Sunbul, Onder; Yormaz, Seha – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2018
Purpose: Several studies can be found in the literature that investigate the performance of ? under various conditions. However no study for the effects of item difficulty, item discrimination, and ability restrictions on the performance of ? could be found. The current study aims to investigate the performance of ? for the conditions given below.…
Descriptors: Test Items, Difficulty Level, Ability, Cheating
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
According to Wollack and Schoenig (2018), benefitting from item preknowledge is one of the three broad types of test fraud that occur in educational assessments. We use tools from constrained statistical inference to suggest a new statistic that is based on item scores and response times and can be used to detect the examinees who may have…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Items, Reaction Time, Cheating
Yormaz, Seha; Sünbül, Önder – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2017
This study aims to determine the Type I error rates and power of S[subscript 1] , S[subscript 2] indices and kappa statistic at detecting copying on multiple-choice tests under various conditions. It also aims to determine how copying groups are created in order to calculate how kappa statistics affect Type I error rates and power. In this study,…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Sample Size
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
An increasing concern of producers of educational assessments is fraudulent behavior during the assessment (van der Linden, 2009). Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., Eckerly, 2017; McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is one type of fraudulent behavior. This article suggests two new test statistics for detecting individuals who may have…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Testing Problems, Identification
Liebler, Robert – College Student Journal, 2017
Data from published studies is used to recover information about the sample mean self-reported number of times cheated by college students. The sample means were estimated by fitting distributions to the reported data. The few estimated sample means thus recovered were roughly 2 or less.
Descriptors: Cheating, Student Behavior, Undergraduate Students, Student Surveys
Man, Kaiwen; Harring, Jeffery R.; Ouyang, Yunbo; Thomas, Sarah L. – International Journal of Testing, 2018
Many important high-stakes decisions--college admission, academic performance evaluation, and even job promotion--depend on accurate and reliable scores from valid large-scale assessments. However, examinees sometimes cheat by copying answers from other test-takers or practicing with test items ahead of time, which can undermine the effectiveness…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, High Stakes Tests, Test Wiseness, Cheating