Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Predictive Validity | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 2 |
Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Association Measures | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
Coding | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Goldhaber, Dan | 1 |
Grout, Cyrus | 1 |
Huntington-Klein, Nick | 1 |
Kane, Steven T. | 1 |
Medina, Steffanie | 1 |
Olson, Kristina R. | 1 |
Rae, James R. | 1 |
Roy, Soma | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Washington | 3 |
California | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rae, James R.; Olson, Kristina R. – Developmental Psychology, 2018
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is increasingly used in developmental research despite minimal evidence of whether children's IAT scores are reliable across time or predictive of behavior. When test-retest reliability and predictive validity have been assessed, the results have been mixed, and because these studies have differed on many…
Descriptors: Pretests Posttests, Test Reliability, Predictive Validity, Association Measures
Goldhaber, Dan; Grout, Cyrus; Huntington-Klein, Nick – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2015
It is well documented that teachers can have profound effects on student outcomes. Empirical estimates find that a one standard deviation increase in teacher quality raises student test achievement by 10 to 25 percent of a standard deviation. More recent evidence shows that the effectiveness of teachers can affect long-term student outcomes, such…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Teacher Selection, Selection Tools, Scoring Rubrics
Kane, Steven T.; Roy, Soma; Medina, Steffanie – Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 2013
This article describes research supporting the use of the Learning Difficulties Assessment (LDA), a normed and no-cost, web-based survey that assesses difficulties with reading, writing, spelling, mathematics, listening, concentration, memory, organizational skills, sense of control, and anxiety in college students. Previous research has supported…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Identification, College Students, At Risk Students