Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Phonics | 2 |
| Spelling | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Aural Learning | 1 |
| Beginning Reading | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Learning Activities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Reading Improvement | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Oregon | 2 |
| Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Illinois Test of… | 1 |
| Metropolitan Readiness Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCooke, Nancy L.; Slee, Jill M.; Young, Cheryl A. – Reading Improvement, 2020
There is some evidence that reading and spelling are complementary processes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which contextualized spelling (i.e., spelling activities within the context of reading instruction) is used to support reading in first-grade core reading programs. Analysis of 75 lessons across five programs…
Descriptors: Spelling, Reading Instruction, Teaching Methods, Reading Programs
Download full textBATEMAN, BARBARA – 1967
THE VIEW THAT READING IS A ROTE, AUTOMATIC, CONDITIONED, NONMEANINGFUL PROCESS WHICH PRECEDES (THUS IS SEPARABLE FROM) COMPREHENSION IS CORROBORATED IN A TWO-PART INVESTIGATION. IN PART I, EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED TO SUPPORT THE POSITION THAT READING IS A NONMEANINGFUL PROCESS. IN PART II, A STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF AN AUDITORY APPROACH TO…
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Beginning Reading, Comparative Analysis, Grade 1
